[governance] ICANN head warns against putting Internet

JFC Morfin jefsey at jefsey.com
Thu May 27 07:09:44 EDT 2010


At 11:06 27/05/2010, Bertrand de La Chapelle wrote:
>ICANN, NIMBLE ???? :-))
>
>Not that replacing it with a UN body would improve things. The 
>challenge is how to build a more international, more globally 
>accountable and public interest oriented ICANN, not the mere 
>alternative : either the way ICANN (dis)functions today or another, 
>even more unappealing option. The AoC paves a way forward. Will we 
>collectively be able to move in the right direction ? That is the 
>right question.

Suggestion for a nimbler ICANN: an humbler ICANN.
jfc

PS. The AoC is based upon the ignorance of how names and addresses 
differ, while there is currently no consensus within the ISOCANN 
enhanced cooperation about what an address is - and a systematic 
disinterest in the US odd delegation (how can you delegate what you 
do not own) to ICANN for Class IN (01) only. I suggest that IGF 
meetings start with crash Internet terminology trainings ICANN staff 
should attend (not organize). 

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t



More information about the Governance mailing list