[governance] methods was CSTD

[Lee W McKnight]

because Avri - those who can do, those who can't teach. Speaking for myself only of course. 

Seriously, the best tools to organize IGC may (or may not) be the simple ones we use; but that is not necessarily the same as the best way to operate IGF in its next phase when we're enhancing cooperation ; )
________________________________________
From: Avri Doria [avri at psg.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2010 11:53 PM
To: IGC
Subject: Re: [governance] methods was CSTD

On 23 May 2010, at 21:11, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:

> This was very much like my original vision for the IGF, and in fact I made specific reference to both America Speaks and GRASS as models (see my book at http://books.google.com/books?id=G8ETBPD6jHIC, pages 254-279).  So yes, I completely agree that it is "doable" for the IGF as it has been for many other organisations.

so have we been able to introduce any new working methods or ways of reaching outcomes in the IGC?

if we can't even do it here, in a group that seems to want to do it, what makes us think we can just convince the other stakeholders that they should do so.

a.____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t