[governance] Suggested statement on MAG's future

Tue May 4 04:26:12 EDT 2010

Dear all,
Thanks, Jeremy and Ginger, for the initiative.
I, too, think that the third para should be reformulated. I suggest the following:
The roles of the UNSG and MAG in controlling the IGF process should be re-examined in the light of he relevant articles of the Tunis agenda and of the IGF experience so far. While the UNSG has the overall authority over the IGF in terms of convening it (§72, §74), reporting on its operation (§75) and examining the desirability of its continuation (§76), the IGF in its working and function, will be multilateral,multi-stakeholder, democratic and transparent (§73). In post-Tunis practice, the MAG has evolved into the main actor managing the actual "working and function" of the IGF, ensuring "the complementarity between all stakeholders involved in this process - governments, business entities, civil society and intergovernmental organizations" (§73a)

Best,
Yrjö 
> Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 08:20:20 +0100
> From: jeanette at wzb.eu
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; jeremy at ciroap.org
> Subject: Re: [governance] Suggested statement on MAG's future
> 
> Hi Jeremy,
> 
> thank you for the draft statement.
> 
> I have issues with the following sentences:
> 
> Whilst the United Nations Secretary-General is the titular leader of the 
> IGF process, this is a formal appointment only.  Rightful control of the 
> IGF as a process or institution of Internet governance belongs 
> ultimately to the stakeholders themselves.
> 
> What does that mean, it is a formal appointment only. Have you, for 
> example, asked the secretariat if they also regard this appointment as 
> merely formal? I think you would be surprised. Also, I don't understand 
> the meaning of "rightful" in this context. Is it supposed to mean what 
> you or we find just or adequate? Then this should be made more clear.
> 
> Many of these issues we have discussed before and I can only repeat my 
> positions:
> 
> I don't think it is feasible and desirable for the stakeholders to 
> choose their members for the MAG. We need somebody sorting out issues of 
> regional and gender representation. Expertise is also an issue in this 
> context.
> 
> I am also not convinced that the MAG should get more authority. This 
> would raise problems of legitimacy and most likely bring the equality 
> between governments and other stakeholders in the MAG and the IGF in 
> general to an end.
> 
> Finally, the issue of transparency: The secretariat publishes a summary 
> of the MAG's discussions as a response to the request for more 
> transparency. If the caucus thinks this is not enough or doesn't do what 
> we need, perhaps we should be more specific than just repeating what we 
> have said for years?
> 
> 
> jeanette
> 
> Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
> > Ginger and I have been silent on the drafting of a statement on the 
> > future of the MAG for its meeting on the 12th, in the hope that such a 
> > statement would emerge from the bottom up, but in order not to let the 
> > opportunity slip, allow me now to propose some text for discussion. 
> >  There are six paragraphs.  If you have an issue, please state which 
> > paragraph is of concern, and please make your suggestions as focussed as 
> > possible.
> > 
> > --- begins ---
> > 
> > The Internet Governance Caucus (IGC) supports the maintenance of 
> > the Multistakeholder Advisory Group (MAG) of the Internet Governance 
> > Forum (IGF), as the body that links the UN Secretariat to the 
> > stakeholder groups that are the joint sovereigns of Internet governance. 
> >  We would like to see the democratic legitimacy and effectiveness of the 
> > MAG strengthened as it continues into a renewed term for the IGF.
> > 
> > To this end, in our statement for the February open consultation and MAG 
> > meetings, the IGC suggested that the composition of the MAG itself 
> > should be more evenly divided between the stakeholder groups.  We also 
> > reported that many believe that the stakeholders should have a more 
> > direct role in the selection of MAG members, and that MAG discussions 
> > should continue to be made more transparent.
> > 
> > We also consider that care must be taken in balancing the respective 
> > roles of the Secretariat and the MAG.  Whilst the United Nations 
> > Secretary-General is the titular leader of the IGF process, this is a 
> > formal appointment only.  Rightful control of the IGF as a process or 
> > institution of Internet governance belongs ultimately to the 
> > stakeholders themselves.  Therefore, the Secretariat's role ought to 
> > remain a purely facilitative and technical one.
> > 
> > In underlining this, the appropriate role of the MAG, as the only 
> > representative body of the stakeholders within the IGF process, becomes 
> > clear.  Namely, it should be responsible for every decision that effects 
> > the substantive work of the IGF.  This includes agenda setting, 
> > overseeing the preparation of briefing and synthesis documents, and 
> > reshaping the IGF's structure and working methods (such as the 
> > establishment of thematic working groups).
> > 
> > In the future, its role may go further still.  Until now, the IGF has 
> > been largely just a forum for discussion.  Looking to the future, the 
> > Secretary-General's report on the continuation of the IGF envisages that 
> > it may come to produce some form of recommendations.  If so, the MAG 
> > will have a role in supporting that process too, likely in shaping the 
> > content of any statements that are to be issued in conformity with the 
> > consensus of the plenary forum.
> > 
> > Whatever the future may hold for the IGF, the MAG will be integral to 
> > it.  This is why it is so important that the composition of the MAG is 
> > balanced, that the process of selection of its members satisfies the 
> > stakeholder groups from which they are drawn, that its operations are 
> > conducted with a high degree of transparency in order to ensure its 
> > accountability to the stakeholders at large, and that its legitimate 
> > role is not usurped.
> > 
> > --- ends ---
> > 
> > Perhaps time is too short for us to agree on this statement (extending 
> > the delay, I'm writing while away without Internet access), but let's 
> > try and see how far we get.
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > *Jeremy Malcolm
> > Project Coordinator*
> > Consumers International
> > Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia Pacific and the Middle East
> > Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, 
> > Malaysia
> > Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
> > 
> > *CI is 50*
> > Consumers International marks 50 years of the global consumer movement 
> > in 2010.
> > Celebrate with us as we continue to support, promote and protect 
> > consumer rights around the world. 
> > _http://www.consumersinternational.org/50_
> > 
> > Read our email confidentiality notice 
> > <http://www.consumersinternational.org/Templates/Internal.asp?NodeID=100521&int1stParentNodeID=89765>. 
> > Don't print this email unless necessary.
> > 
> > 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100504/6e8d0a10/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t