[governance] ICANN declined Bulgarian IDN fast-track

[Avri Doria]

hi,

you are right about the substance.  the only thing it might be confused for is 6r.  and leading numbers aren't allowed anyway - so 6r is illegal.  the board should reconsider.

but you are wrong if you think the board members are picked for their intellectual consistency.  and i am not sure why they should be, given the diversity of their origin and experience.

also all of the similarities you mention below were done by ISO and Postel and these directors never had a say it, so it is irrelevant from a consistency, intellectual or otherwise, point of view.

a.

PS.  besides, all of my MBA friends tell me that intellectuality and corporate management do not mix.


On 27 Jun 2010, at 14:15, Louis Pouzin wrote:

> If the ICANN board were intellectually consistent in its abysmal thinking, it should ban half ot the following ccTLDs that are "confusingly similar".
> 
>        Al vs. AI
>        Cl vs. CI
>        GI vs. Gl
>        IR vs. lR
>        IS vs. lS
>        IT vs. lT
>        NI vs. Nl
>        Sl vs. SI
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t