[governance] Fwd: [] CALL FOR STATEMENTS OF INTEREST:

Sun Jul 25 09:41:04 EDT 2010

I am sorry Alan and Cheryl. I really don't get it. Does this mean you 
have discussed different comments on your white paper in different 
places or documents? I havn't found anything under the link Alan posted. 
Perhaps I am just not clever enough to understand your filing and 
communication system. Should there by any document by ALAC that does 
indeed reflect my comments, I would be grateful if you could point me to 
it in a private email. I don't think it makes much sense to continue 
this exchange on a public list.
jeanette

On 24.07.2010 20:19, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> Jeanette, the comments submitted via the Wiki or e-mail were addressed
> in the report to the SIC. It is pointed to by
> https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?at_large_director_appointment_process.
>
>
> Regarding the Public Comment periods, sadly, that is the norm. The
> initial report of the PDP WT, which is recommending significant changes
> to the process by which gTLD policy is developed, has been posted for 8
> weeks and so far has attracted zero comments. But I think you have
> identified the specific issue here. Those who were most interested
> commented during the At-Large comment period which largely preceded the
> Public Comment Period.
>
> Alan
>
>
> At 24/07/2010 05:36 AM, Jeanette Hofmann wrote:
>> Thanks Cheryl. I followed the link you offered and was a bit surprised.
>>
>> I definitely commented on the white paper and I saw at least one other
>> comment. I remember this well because my comment disappeared the
>> following day and it was a lot of hassle to get it back onto the website.
>>
>> The analysis of comments you point to assumes that there was just one
>> comment from IPC. What happened to the other comments? In any case, it
>> surprises me that there was so little public interest in such a big
>> change of ALAC's constitution or did the discussion perhaps take place
>> elsewhere?
>>
>> jeanette
>>
>> On 23.07.2010 22:43, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:
>> > Yes Jennette of course there is; It is most easily found via the link
>> > labeled Summary/analysis of comments
>> > <http://forum.icann.org/lists/at-large-director/msg00004.html> off the
>> > Public Comments Section in the ICANN site (i.e. attached to the
>> original
>> > ICANN PC space here is the specific document link
>> > http://forum.icann.org/lists/at-large-director/msg00004.html ... and
>> > Staff is following up why that link or document is NOT also easily
>> found
>> > via our Wiki and or the At-Large Web space (this is actually
>> > my preference) particularity now we are changing Wiki's from Social
>> > Text to Confluence and lost of migration will be happening over the
>> next
>> > few months this is going to be important that the
>> > http://www.atlarge.icann.org/ site front page can be used to easily
>> > take people to their archive materials and collaborative works
>> > spaces...But that is another matter...
>> >
>> > Cheryl Langdon-Orr
>> > (CLO)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 23 July 2010 21:02, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette at wzb.eu
>> > <mailto:jeanette at wzb.eu>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Cheryl,
>> >
>> > is there any document available that would describe which comments
>> > on the white paper have been taken into account and how?
>> >
>> >
>> > thank you, jeanette
>> >
>> >
>> > On 23.07.2010 02:34, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Karl and list, inserted below is (part) of an email I sent
>> > on this
>> > matter to the NARALO list from a question raised by Avri on the
>> > matter
>> > of approved processes... I trust these links will assist you re
>> > background on this...
>> >
>> > To answer the question about the approved process, the White
>> > Paper on the whole selection Process went to full ICANN Public
>> > Comment back
>> > in Feb this year (ending 6th March) see
>> >
>> http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201003-en.htm#at-large-director;
>>
>> > and of course all the details of all the activities involved in
>> > this process
>> > are found on pages linked from the Wiki Master page in this
>> > important topic
>> > =>
>> >
>> https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?at_large_director_appointment_process
>>
>> >
>> >
>> <http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201003-en.htm#at-large-director>
>>
>> > Cheryl Langdon-Orr
>> > (CLO)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 22 July 2010 07:12, Karl Auerbach <karl at cavebear.com
>> > <mailto:karl at cavebear.com>
>> > <mailto:karl at cavebear.com <mailto:karl at cavebear.com>>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 07/21/2010 10:56 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>> >
>> > From: ICANN At-Large Staff<staff at atlarge.icann.org
>> > <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>
>> > <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Subject: [At-Large] CALL FOR STATEMENTS OF INTEREST:
>> > ALAC-selected
>> > ICANN Board Member
>> >
>> >
>> > Call for Statements of Interest (SOIs) from ICANN's
>> > At-Large
>> > Community for consideration to be selected by the
>> > At-Large
>> > Advisory
>> > Committee (ALAC) to serve as a (term-limited) member
>> > of the
>> > ICANN
>> > Board of Directors
>> >
>> >
>> > This announcement seems premature given that no process has
>> > yet been
>> > established for the public to chose who its director(s)
>> > shall be.
>> > At best there is a proposal (a very poor one in my eyes)
>> > on the table.
>> >
>> > It seems as if ICANN is asking people to throw their hats
>> > into the
>> > ring, with the ALAC presuming that it will be appointed as
>> > ringmaster, and before the ring itself has been designed.
>> >
>> > --karl--
>> >
>> >
>> > ____________________________________________________________
>> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> > governance at lists.cpsr.org <mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org>
>> > <mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org> <mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org>>
>> >
>> > To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>> > governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>> > <mailto:governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org>
>> > <mailto:governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org>
>> <mailto:governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org>>
>> >
>> >
>> > For all list information and functions, see:
>> > http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>> >
>> > Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t