[governance] Fwd: [] CALL FOR STATEMENTS OF INTEREST:

[Jeanette Hofmann]

Thanks Cheryl. I followed the link you offered and was a bit surprised.

I definitely commented on the white paper and I saw at least one other 
comment. I remember this well because my comment disappeared the 
following day and it was a lot of hassle to get it back onto the website.

The analysis of comments you point to assumes that there was just one 
comment from IPC. What happened to the other comments? In any case, it 
surprises me that there was so little public interest in such a big 
change of ALAC's constitution or did the discussion perhaps take place 
elsewhere?

jeanette

On 23.07.2010 22:43, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:
> Yes Jennette of course there is; It is most easily found via the link
>   labeled Summary/analysis of comments
> <http://forum.icann.org/lists/at-large-director/msg00004.html> off the
> Public Comments Section in the ICANN site (i.e. attached to the original
> ICANN PC space  here is the specific document link
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/at-large-director/msg00004.html  ... and
> Staff is following up why that link or document is NOT also easily found
> via our Wiki and or the At-Large Web space (this is actually
> my preference) particularity now we are changing Wiki's  from Social
> Text to Confluence and lost of migration will be happening over the next
> few months this is going to be important that the
> http://www.atlarge.icann.org/  site front page can be used to easily
>   take people to their archive materials and collaborative works
> spaces...But that is another matter...
>
> Cheryl Langdon-Orr
> (CLO)
>
>
>
> On 23 July 2010 21:02, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette at wzb.eu
> <mailto:jeanette at wzb.eu>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Cheryl,
>
>     is there any document available that would describe which comments
>     on the white paper have been taken into account and how?
>
>
>     thank you, jeanette
>
>
>     On 23.07.2010 02:34, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:
>
>         Hi Karl and list,  inserted below is (part) of an email I sent
>         on this
>         matter to the NARALO list from a question raised by Avri on the
>         matter
>         of approved processes... I trust these links will assist you re
>         background on this...
>
>           To answer the question about the approved process,  the White
>         Paper on the whole selection Process went to full ICANN Public
>         Comment  back
>         in Feb this year (ending 6th March)  see
>         http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201003-en.htm#at-large-director;
>         and of course all the details of all the activities involved in
>         this process
>         are found on pages linked from the Wiki Master page in this
>         important topic
>         =>
>         https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?at_large_director_appointment_process
>
>         <http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201003-en.htm#at-large-director>
>         Cheryl Langdon-Orr
>         (CLO)
>
>
>
>
>         On 22 July 2010 07:12, Karl Auerbach <karl at cavebear.com
>         <mailto:karl at cavebear.com>
>         <mailto:karl at cavebear.com <mailto:karl at cavebear.com>>> wrote:
>
>             On 07/21/2010 10:56 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>
>                     From: ICANN At-Large Staff<staff at atlarge.icann.org
>         <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>
>         <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>>>
>
>
>
>                     Subject: [At-Large] CALL FOR STATEMENTS OF INTEREST:
>                     ALAC-selected
>                     ICANN Board Member
>
>
>                     Call for Statements of Interest (SOIs) from ICANN's
>         At-Large
>                     Community for consideration to be selected by the
>         At-Large
>                     Advisory
>                     Committee (ALAC) to serve as a (term-limited) member
>         of the
>                     ICANN
>                     Board of Directors
>
>
>             This announcement seems premature given that no process has
>         yet been
>             established for the public to chose who its director(s)
>         shall be.
>               At best there is a proposal (a very poor one in my eyes)
>         on the table.
>
>             It seems as if ICANN is asking people to throw their hats
>         into the
>             ring, with the ALAC presuming that it will be appointed as
>             ringmaster, and before the ring itself has been designed.
>
>                     --karl--
>
>
>             ____________________________________________________________
>             You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>         governance at lists.cpsr.org <mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org>
>         <mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org
>         <mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org>>
>
>             To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>         governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>         <mailto:governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org>
>         <mailto:governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>         <mailto:governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org>>
>
>
>             For all list information and functions, see:
>         http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>             Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t