[governance] Fwd: [] CALL FOR STATEMENTS OF INTEREST:

[Jeanette Hofmann]

Hi Cheryl,

is there any document available that would describe which comments on 
the white paper have been taken into account and how?


thank you, jeanette

On 23.07.2010 02:34, Cheryl Langdon-Orr wrote:
> Hi Karl and list,  inserted below is (part) of an email I sent on this
> matter to the NARALO list from a question raised by Avri on the matter
> of approved processes... I trust these links will assist you re
> background on this...
>
>   To answer the question about the approved process,  the White
> Paper on the whole selection Process went to full ICANN Public Comment  back
> in Feb this year (ending 6th March)  see
> http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201003-en.htm#at-large-director;
> and of course all the details of all the activities involved in this process
> are found on pages linked from the Wiki Master page in this important topic
> =>
> https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?at_large_director_appointment_process
>
> <http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-201003-en.htm#at-large-director>
> Cheryl Langdon-Orr
> (CLO)
>
>
>
>
> On 22 July 2010 07:12, Karl Auerbach <karl at cavebear.com
> <mailto:karl at cavebear.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 07/21/2010 10:56 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
>
>             From: ICANN At-Large Staff<staff at atlarge.icann.org
>             <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org>>
>
>
>             Subject: [At-Large] CALL FOR STATEMENTS OF INTEREST:
>             ALAC-selected
>             ICANN Board Member
>
>
>             Call for Statements of Interest (SOIs) from ICANN's At-Large
>             Community for consideration to be selected by the At-Large
>             Advisory
>             Committee (ALAC) to serve as a (term-limited) member of the
>             ICANN
>             Board of Directors
>
>
>     This announcement seems premature given that no process has yet been
>     established for the public to chose who its director(s) shall be.
>       At best there is a proposal (a very poor one in my eyes) on the table.
>
>     It seems as if ICANN is asking people to throw their hats into the
>     ring, with the ALAC presuming that it will be appointed as
>     ringmaster, and before the ring itself has been designed.
>
>             --karl--
>
>
>     ____________________________________________________________
>     You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org <mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org>
>     To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>     <mailto:governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org>
>
>     For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>     Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t