[governance] [Re-post] Consensus call on IGC statement: please

[McTim]

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:54 PM, William Drake
<william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch> wrote:
> Hi,
> Given the way the process was managed and the options are now framed, I vote
> no.

I'm with Bill on this.  NO on process, NO on statement.

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t