AW: [governance] Consensus call on IGC statement: please respond

[Jeremy Malcolm]

On 29/01/2010, at 6:52 PM, Parminder wrote:

>>> I suggest - you remove the part on 'innovative contributions' reg MAG, since there was always enough controversy regarding it for it not to be there in first place....
>> 
>> Like others, I cannot fathom how this suggests support for the disbandment of the MAG.  
> Because that is the spirit and background in which those who suggested that sentence made it

Would it make a difference to your "NO" vote to remove it?  If so, then I ask Wolfgang, McTim and Bill, how firmly wedded to it are you - would you agree to its removal for Parminder's sake?  If so on both counts, then I think we can remove it, but without disrupting the consensus call in progress.

-- 
Jeremy Malcolm
Project Coordinator
Consumers International
Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia Pacific and the Middle East
Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Tel: +60 3 7726 1599

CI is 50
Consumers International marks 50 years of the global consumer movement in 2010.
Celebrate with us as we continue to support, promote and protect consumer rights around the world. 
http://www.consumersinternational.org/50

Read our email confidentiality notice. Don't print this email unless necessary.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100129/d79442fe/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t