[governance] PLEASE RESPOND - draft statement on reform of the

[Carlos A. Afonso]

Thanks, Jeremy. I agree with the suggestions for modification from 
Souter and others and wait for the updated statement.

frt rgds

--c.a.

Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:34:55 +0100, Bertrand de La Chapelle
> <bdelachapelle at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Jeremy,
>>
>> Just one (I hope constructive) comment on the interesting draft you
>> circulated. The title currently is : "Statement on the reform of the
> IGF".
>> I believe the use of the term "reform" sends a message that could be
>> misinterpreted and/or exploited by actors that strongly oppose the IGF
> 
> Thanks for this point. The title was more of a working title for our use,
> not specifically to be used when the document is submitted. Thus, the word
> "reform" is not used in the body text. Thus we can, I agree, submit it
> under a more neutral title such as "Submission of the IGC in taking stock
> of the Sharm el Sheikh meeting of the IGF".
> 
>> A few minor suggested edits (*in blue* with suppressed words in red) are
>> also included in the text. They usually are pointers to coded words in
> the
>> UN language or the governmental discussions and it's important for you to
>> have them in mind.
> 
> Thanks, and thanks also to those who have commented on the preamble and
> paragraph 1 so far. Please, anyone, feel free to move on to paragraphs 2, 3
> and following. I will compile all the suggested changes (where compatible)
> in a day or two and re-circulate.
> 
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t