[governance] CONSENSUS CALL on statement to UNSG on bypassing

[McTim]

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
> Yes.
>
> Separately; while I agree that 30-40 emails with yes no etc suddenly
> appearing in the inbox may put off some people I also see the advantage on
> stating one's vote in full view of the list...
>
> In any case the charters says that all voting, unless specified with due
> reason, will be open, and therefore even if done by a survey tool the votes
> must be finally published.

right, and the charter also says that our list and our website will be
the primary workspaces.

voting is reserved for elections IIRC.  Making of statements is not
subject to voting.  Let's nip this in the bud.

I am fine with the statement BTW, just not fine with "voting" on it.
-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t