[governance] Separate statement on themes for Vilnius

[Yehuda Katz]

Michael,

I see this as explicitly plausible; in terms of 'socio & economic development'
we already see that cyber-real estate .dot (whatever interest) creates a basis
for intellectual exploitation (Invention).

Take for example .NYC, it is not-just-limited to enity within the Geographic
area, The space is subject to the creative economic exploitation within the
context of .NYC, that being so, should the Governance of the .NYC cyber-space
employ Terms that create a 'Sustained Evolution of Concepts' [intellectual
exploitation (a.k.a.: Invention!)] a distinct pattern(s) unique to New York
City will be. The Socio patterns of life in .NYC give it, its flavor, its
taste, its style.
New York is New York because its New York (New Yorkers), Paris is Paris because
its Paris, Berlin is Berlin because its Berlin ....

A discussion on "Governance" that Gives-Life to CyberSpace, which in turn
creates individually unique pools of expression (.NYC, .Paris, .Berlin,
.dot...) which are Socially and Economically sustainable.

The dynamics of a Metropolis are very useful here in discussion, for example:
Urban Renewal, how can we relate that concept to Domain Expiration, so that the
CyberSpace can be rejuvenated into something socially redeeming and
economically positive (how can it be reinvented successfully?).

Vertical Development (High Rises & Sky Scrapers) What Rules are necessary to
keep the playing field level, but also allow Development to continue? 
Microsoft.Nyc, Microsoft.Paris, Microsoft.Berlin ... Sky Scrapers | Trump.NYC,
TrumpPlaza.NYC, TrumpTowers.NYC ... High Rises
What are the Limits for commercial development? What are the Guidelines for
Public Development, what are the Requirements for Individual Development.

Traffic (Net traffic | Search traffic): is there a System for Traffic
Management? Imagine navigating your car through New York City with without
Traffic Lights at 5:00pm - Chaos!

Lots of things could be done, For instance ... what if the .NYC was divided
into three-time-zones as follows:
00:00-08:00 hours [midnight to 8 a.m.]
08:00-17:00 hours [8 a.m. to 5 p.m.]
17:00-00:00 hours [5 p.m. to midnight]

the following could evolve:
time-slot-1.nyc [midnight to 8 a.m.]
time-slot-2.nyc [8 a.m. to 5 p.m.]
time-slot-3.nyc [5 p.m. to midnight]

Three different websites working in the same Namespace at different times, is
plausible when we consider that, New York City, Paris, Berlin, Tokyo, Hong
Kong, Mumbi etc... are all a 24/7/365 Metropolis. 

Building Codes (Software Development) What technologies are currently 'allowed'
for use in the space? In terms of Websites for example, If a .html website
would be considered "out of building codes" as that html5 is now considered the
"Standard", the website might be considered 'Condemned' until the Owner makes
improvements or the cyberspace is slated for Urban Renewal.

I think you get the idea.
There is plenty of Socio-Economic Governance Formuli to discuss here.
In this Arena (please excuse my french) Icann has fucked-up, They have sold out
to commercial interest & profits. Which in turn has killed the existance of a
'Sustained Evolution of Concepts' (a.k.a.: Invention!).

So this is what we need to shoot for, this is the Service we can provide. 
'The Power of Process to the People', that enables Them to evolve and as a
result, shape the Internet into life.

Kind regards

-

Re: Michael Gurstein
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/arc/governance/2010-02/msg00022.html
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t