[governance] Re: Separate statement on themes for Vilnius

[Eric Dierker]

What does this mean?  Net Neutrality seems a good "current".  The US definately has "industrialist" types that could use a little more "governance".  But Carlos we cannot stay so "neutral" in our speech that we do not say things clearly.

--- On Mon, 2/1/10, Carlos A. Afonso <ca at cafonso.ca> wrote:



There is a current of thought in the US which is strongly against the concepts of net neutrality, .......
 
 Outside of the US, we continue in most places to experience the damage of outright violations, and as a result  all we manage to do is keep quiet as a caucus when people propose this as a main topic for the IGF. So should we continue to be happy with this relegated to a workshop?

--c.a.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100201/9eee8a7a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t