[governance] Re: My note on CSTD IGF WG consultation Dec 17
Imran Ahmed Shah
ias_pk at yahoo.com
Wed Dec 22 06:19:00 EST 2010
Dear CS IGC coordinators and All IGC Fellows,
I had been observing the efforts of Izumi while CSTD/IGF at Geneva.
Off course he served his responsibility to maximum level with his
self-motivation.
With reference to the establishment of a Working Group parallel to the
governmental setup, my suggestions are as follows:
1. The proposed Name of the Group should not be limited to Non-Govt.
only,
(as most of us were agreed for the slogan of Multi-stakeholder contribution &
collaboration)
We may establish a larger group with the participation
of Multi-stakeholders: including CS, NGOs, Private/Business entities, Gov.
Representatives, Academia,
Technical Experts as well as the ISPs/Telecom Companies.
2. We could establish this group within the framework of CS IGC as we
prepared last month, however, as per the suggestions of the caucus members and
intentions of affiliations of some other organizations, yes we can give it a new
name, a new organization which may have affiliations of different
organizations/institutions.
3 We can also offer limited seats for the membership of Experts Panel
as per any formula like 5+5+5 + + + = n members of all Multi-stakeholders.
This expert panel may work on the given tasks like review of IGF,
Future Requirements and proposals for Policies Development regarded to Global
Internet Governance.
4. I also suggest to open an affiliation mechanism, so the different
organization will join it for a common cause, sharing idea, common policies
development and for declaration of common statement like this IGF consultation.
5. I would also propose the name of the Organization as well as the
Domain Name:
Organization Name: Global Internet Governance Council (gIGC)
Domain Name: gIGCouncil.org
(this domain name is available at this moment, if the coordinators take sharp
step to register this domain,
otherwise if you depute this task to me, IGFPAK.org may offer
free registration + hosting for this common initiative)
6. Note: A common name with Broader vision may bring additional
advantages. Otherwise, if we establish a step on bias level at the foundation,
the construction efforts may not be useful (at its own framework) after a period
of time when the common issue is resolved.
Thanking you and Best Regards
Imran Ahmed Shah
Urdu Internet Society
Internet Governance of Pakistan
________________________________
From: Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org>
To: "governance at lists.cpsr.org" <governance at lists.cpsr.org>; Izumi AIZU
<iza at anr.org>
Cc: "graham at isoc.org" <graham at isoc.org>; Luis Magalhães
<Luis.magalhaes at umic.pt>; "aaron.holtz at fco.gsi.gov.uk"
<aaron.holtz at fco.gsi.gov.uk>; Adiel Akplogan <adiel at afrinic.net>; Adam Peake
<ajp at glocom.ac.jp>; Ana Neves <ana.neves at umic.pt>; Anne-Rachel Inne
<anne-rachel.inne at icann.org>; Anriette Esterhuysen <anriette at apc.org>; Axel
Pawlik <axel.pawlik at ripe.net>; Ayesha Hassan <ayesha.hassan at iccwbo.org>;
"baher.esmat at icann.org" <baher.esmat at icann.org>; Bertrand de la Chapelle
<bdelachapelle at gmail.com>; Constance Bommelaer <bommelaer at isoc.org>; Byron
Holland <byron.holland at cira.ca>; "ca at rits.org.br" <ca at rits.org.br>; Chris
Disspain <ceo at auda.org.au>; "chambers at isoc.org" <chambers at isoc.org>; Cathy
Handley <chandley at arin.net>; Chris Hemmerlein <chemmerlein at ntia.doc.gov>;
"chris.lomax at fco.gsi.gov.uk" <chris.lomax at fco.gsi.gov.uk>; Dan Graham
<dan.graham at isoc.org>; "eiriarte at lactld.org" <eiriarte at lactld.org>; Fiona
Alexander <falexander at ntia.doc.gov>; Frank March <Frank.march at med.govt.nz>;
"german at apnic.net" <german at apnic.net>; "glaser at nic.br" <glaser at nic.br>; Heather
Dryden <heather.dryden at ic.gc.ca>; "hirokazu.igarashi at mofa.go.jp"
<hirokazu.igarashi at mofa.go.jp>; Scott Hoyt <hoyt at isoc.org>; "jb7454 at att.com"
<jb7454 at att.com>; "jeff.brueggeman at att.com" <jeff.brueggeman at att.com>
Sent: Wed, 22 December, 2010 5:10:00
Subject: Re: [governance] Re: My note on CSTD IGF WG consultation Dec 17
Bill Graham wrote:
>> And yes, let's have a list. I could get one created @ ISOC. What criteria for
>>membership?
>
> Hosted by ISOC will give some message, positive and negative,
> like any other organizations such as IGC or ICC (all starting with I and
> ending with C, so shall we invite IOC? ;-).
How about registering a domain as the first step towards establishing a new
umbrella organisation of all non-governmental participants in IG - the "plan C"
of which there has been talk. It could be this new organisation that formally
and publicly submits the list of 15 non-governmental members to the CSTD working
group (albiet made up of 5+5+5 selected by IGC, ICC and ISOC).
The new domain could be Council of Non-Governmental Stakeholders in Internet
Governance - CoNGSIG (congsig.org is available)... thoughts?
PS. Will endeavour to purge the governance list archives of accidental ccs.
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20101222/7fb81504/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list