[governance] Brazilian speech morning session CSTD

[Michael Gurstein]

Yes, I agree that that is the deeper game that is being played--I was simply
referring to the particular set of strategic manuevers being played out at
the moment...

M

-----Original Message-----
From: Lee W McKnight [mailto:lmcknigh at syr.edu] 
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 9:20 AM
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Michael Gurstein; 'Drake William'; 'Marilia
Maciel'
Subject: RE: [governance] Brazilian speech morning session CSTD


My 2 cents from my Syracuse cheap seat: real issue is neither seats at
CSTD's temporary table nor openness of this IGF improvements suggesting
process.

It's about future of 'enhanced cooperation,' with many developing countries
putting in markers now for a future Internet IGO aka mechanism for enhanced
cooperation.

So I'm guessing they reach a conclusion semi-acceptable to cs for now, but
this whole day is but a sideshow to 2011's theater.

Lee
________________________________________
From: governance-request at lists.cpsr.org [governance-request at lists.cpsr.org]
On Behalf Of Michael Gurstein [gurstein at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 12:09 PM
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; 'Drake William'; 'Marilia Maciel'
Subject: RE: [governance] Brazilian speech morning session CSTD

Hmmm... Interesting... Clearly a difference in perception as to what the
central issue is...

Some (all?) governments seem to see it as a question of "transparency" and
"openness", everyone else sees it as an issue of "seat at the table-ism".

M
-----Original Message-----
From: governance-request at lists.cpsr.org
[mailto:governance-request at lists.cpsr.org] On Behalf Of Drake William
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 8:50 AM
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Marilia Maciel
Subject: Re: [governance] Brazilian speech morning session CSTD

Since I just finished sending Alvaro a reply on the same, I might as well
share it.

Thanks Alvaro.  I appreciate your intent to find a middle way, but being
invited as a non-member of the WG to speak at a meeting isn't real
multistakeholderism, isn't consistent with the Tunis Agenda, and isn't
terribly attractive.  I don't see why nongovernmental should help in such a
scenario, personally.


On Dec 17, 2010, at 5:44 PM, Marilia Maciel wrote:

Brazilian speech, Dec 17th, morning session CSTD:

QUOTE

Brazil welcomes the way out we find today that is discussing ways of
involving stakeholders but always respecting UN rules:

Brazil also would like to play a constructive role in this, and we believe
we could offer to your consideration Madam Chairperson, two suggestions
regarding transparency and openess:

    *   The meetings should also be fully committed to openess: each chair
of each meetings of the working group may invite, for example, 5 speakers
from each stakeholder group which are recognized in Tunis Agenda - civil
society, business sector and international institutions;

       *   each stakeholders present in each session of work could decide
themselves who will be the five representatives, but they will take into
account, whenever possible, the balanced participation of representatives
from developing and developed countries, including those who are not already
registered as observers in UN or ECOSOC;

    *   The working group already defined by you, Madam Chairperson, will
have meetings that are fully committed to transparency - any states, or
other stakeholders may attend the meetings.

In order to conclude Brazil would like to thank you very much, Madam
Chairperson, for all the consultations made about the establishment of this
working group: in vilnius, in last november and december the 6th. You
provided us an example of how dealing with a such a complex process in a
transparent way, not in a black box approach"

UNQUOTE

--
Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade
FGV Direito Rio

Center for Technology and Society
Getulio Vargas Foundation
Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
    governance at lists.cpsr.org<mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org>
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
 
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org<mailto:governance-unsubscribe at lists.cp
sr.org>

For all list information and functions, see:
    http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
 Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch<mailto:william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch
>
www.williamdrake.org
***********************************************************


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t