[governance] Shah' stmt at the close of today

[John Curran]

On Dec 15, 2010, at 5:02 AM, Drake William wrote:

> The government representatives were all on topic.  With a few exceptions, the nongovernmental representatives were typically off topic, long self indulgent speeches about their own activities, views on the state of the world, etc.  It's hard to see how that helped make the case for the superiority and necessity of a multistakeholder process.  Reminiscent of some similar WSIS episodes, and arguably underscores that Geneva is a better setting for us than NYC.
> 
> Hopefully the Brazil-India-South Africa text proposing a strictly intergovernmental group will be posted somewhere….
> 
> Best,
> 
> Bill

Bill - 
 
  Did you feel that the NRO or ISOC comments were off-topic?

/John

(who spoke on behalf of the NRO)____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t