[governance] <Urgent> Draft Joint Letter protesting CSTD WG composition only by governments

[Izumi AIZU]

Dear all,

Thank you for the unanimous support to the joint letter.
Having seen that I told ISOC, ICC and others that IGC support it
and about less than 2 hours ago, while I was still in bed,
they have sent the letter to Mr. Frederic Riehl, Vice Chair of CSTD.

Quite a few organizations have singed it already and it is on
 the increase. I will forward the one already sent.

They also plan to send 2nd letter, to address to the Madam Chair
of CSTD, Sherry Ayittey, too.  I will also forward the text.

Now, we also have our own draft text, I like to also send it
later today, before Geneva working hours end. I will also
post the current text so that you can further support it.

Many thanks,

izumi



2010/12/10 SAMUELS,Carlton A <carlton.samuels at uwimona.edu.jm>:
> I support this text.
>
>
>
> Carlton Samuels
>
>
>
> From: izumiaizu at gmail.com [mailto:izumiaizu at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Izumi
> AIZU
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 7:53 PM
> To: Governance List
> Subject: [governance] <Urgent> Draft Joint Letter protesting CSTD WG
> composition only by governments
>
>
>
> Dear list,
>
> The "rumor" that the decision to compose CSTD WG only by governments
> is now proven to be true, decided by very few members of CSTD.
>
> I have contacted ICC and ISOC, similar to the joint letter work we had on
> Dec 14 consultation on enhanced cooperation. They shared the same
> concern and worked out with many others mostly at ICANN Cartagena
> meeting including ICANN, government folks etc:  UK, Sweden, US,
> ICANN, ccNSO etc.
>
> Here is the draft text as of now. They plan to send it shortly, and asking
> IGC
> to join. There may be last-minute minor edit, but it is almost final.
>
> I propose that IGC to sign. IF you have any comments or suggestions,
> please reply to this quickly.  In general, we need 48 hours to decide,
> but in this
> special case, we may not have that luxury of time.
>
> I have prepared our own draft (sorry for the complication), and now
> it is being edited by our nominees for CSTD WG. My suggestion is
> to carry on this draft as well, and send it in addition to the joint one.
>
> I will post that draft in a separate email and welcome your comments.
> We will send that and perhaps make statement at Dec 17 WG meeting
> if they do not change their decision. We will also include that and
> read that at Dec 14 EC consultation meeting in New York.
>
> Sorry for the confusing manner, but this could happen, and I think
> acting quickly to keep the Multi-stakeholder framework is urgently
> needed and important for us.
>
> I hope you understand and support this.
>
> best,
>
> izumi
>
> ------------------
> DRAFT
>
> To Frederic Riehl
> Cc Ghana Chair of the CSTD
>
> We are surprised and deeply concerned by the CSTD Bureau’s decision
> that  the Working Group on IGF Improvements mandated by resolution
> (2010/2) of the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)
> will be composed exclusively of member states.
> This ECOSOC resolution, which was initially negotiated during the CSTD
> in May 2010 by or in the presence of many of the signatories below,
> asked the Chair of the CSTD to establish a Working Group to: "seek,
> compile and review inputs from all Member States and all other
> stakeholders on improvements to the Internet Governance Forum (IGF),
> in line with the mandate set out in the Tunis Agenda".
> These words are a clear reference to the paragraph of the WSIS Plan of
> Action (Geneva 2003) that led to the establishment of the very
> successful Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG) and ultimately
> the creation of the IGF itself:
>
> We ask the Secretary-General of the United Nations to set up a working
> group on Internet governance, in an open and inclusive process that
> ensures a mechanism for the full and active participation of
> governments, the private sector and civil society from both developing
> and developed countries, involving relevant intergovernmental and
> international organizations and forums, to investigate and make
> proposals for action…
>
> We therefore expected that the composition of the Working Group would
> be strongly inspired by the methodology adopted for setting up the
> multi-stakeholder WGIG, as stated as the CSTD Vice-Chair’s
> recommendation in his report on the meeting he convened on 16
> September 2010.
>
> The format decided by the Bureau of the CSTD is contrary to both the
> letter and the spirit of the ECOSOC resolution and is therefore not
> acceptable.
>
> In any event, it is not up to the Bureau of the CSTD to make a
> decision on this matter. This is not a Working Group of the CSTD, but
> rather a Working Group to be convened by the Chair of the CSTD as
> instructed by the ECOSOC resolution.
> The CSTD Chair entrusted you with the mission of implementing the
> request made to her. In light of that and the above information we
> urge you to retract the decision of 7 December, and to establish an
> appropriately constituted Working Group consistent with the WSIS
> formulation ensuring “the full and active participation of
> governments, the private sector and civil society from both developing
> and developed countries, involving relevant intergovernmental and
> international organizations and forums”.
>
> ------------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t