[governance] <Urgent> Draft Joint Letter protesting CSTD WG composition only by governments
Graciela Selaimen
graciela at nupef.org.br
Thu Dec 9 04:23:39 EST 2010
I also agree.
Thanks, Izumi.
Graciela Selaimen
Instituto Nupef
> > Message du 09/12/10 01:54
> > De : "Izumi AIZU"
> > A : "Governance List"
> > Copie à :
> > Objet : [governance] Draft Joint Letter protesting CSTD WG
> composition only by governments
> >
> > Dear list,
> >
> > The "rumor" that the decision to compose CSTD WG only by governments
> > is now proven to be true, decided by very few members of CSTD.
> >
> > I have contacted ICC and ISOC, similar to the joint letter work
> we had on
> > Dec 14 consultation on enhanced cooperation. They shared the same
> > concern and worked out with many others mostly at ICANN Cartagena
> > meeting including ICANN, government folks etc: UK, Sweden, US,
> > ICANN, ccNSO etc.
> >
> > Here is the draft text as of now. They plan to send it shortly,
> and asking IGC
> > to join. There may be last-minute minor edit, but it is almost
> final.
> >
> > I propose that IGC to sign. IF you have any comments or suggestions,
> > please reply to this quickly. In general, we need 48 hours to
> decide,
> > but in this
> > special case, we may not have that luxury of time.
> >
> > I have prepared our own draft (sorry for the complication), and now
> > it is being edited by our nominees for CSTD WG. My suggestion is
> > to carry on this draft as well, and send it in addition to the
> joint one.
> >
> > I will post that draft in a separate email and welcome your
> comments.
> > We will send that and perhaps make statement at Dec 17 WG meeting
> > if they do not change their decision. We will also include that and
> > read that at Dec 14 EC consultation meeting in New York.
> >
> > Sorry for the confusing manner, but this could happen, and I think
> > acting quickly to keep the Multi-stakeholder framework is urgently
> > needed and important for us.
> >
> > I hope you understand and support this.
> >
> > best,
> >
> > izumi
> >
> > ------------------
> > DRAFT
> >
> > To Frederic Riehl
> > Cc Ghana Chair of the CSTD
> >
> > We are surprised and deeply concerned by the CSTD Bureau’s decision
> > that the Working Group on IGF Improvements mandated by resolution
> > (2010/2) of the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)
> > will be composed exclusively of member states.
> > This ECOSOC resolution, which was initially negotiated during
> the CSTD
> > in May 2010 by or in the presence of many of the signatories below,
> > asked the Chair of the CSTD to establish a Working Group to: "seek,
> > compile and review inputs from all Member States and all other
> > stakeholders on improvements to the Internet Governance Forum (IGF),
> > in line with the mandate set out in the Tunis Agenda".
> > These words are a clear reference to the paragraph of the WSIS
> Plan of
> > Action (Geneva 2003) that led to the establishment of the very
> > successful Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG) and
> ultimately
> > the creation of the IGF itself:
> >
> > We ask the Secretary-General of the United Nations to set up a
> working
> > group on Internet governance, in an open and inclusive process that
> > ensures a mechanism for the full and active participation of
> > governments, the private sector and civil society from both
> developing
> > and developed countries, involving relevant intergovernmental and
> > international organizations and forums, to investigate and make
> > proposals for action…
> >
> > We therefore expected that the composition of the Working Group
> would
> > be strongly inspired by the methodology adopted for setting up the
> > multi-stakeholder WGIG, as stated as the CSTD Vice-Chair’s
> > recommendation in his report on the meeting he convened on 16
> > September 2010.
> >
> > The format decided by the Bureau of the CSTD is contrary to both the
> > letter and the spirit of the ECOSOC resolution and is therefore not
> > acceptable.
> >
> > In any event, it is not up to the Bureau of the CSTD to make a
> > decision on this matter. This is not a Working Group of the
> CSTD, but
> > rather a Working Group to be convened by the Chair of the CSTD as
> > instructed by the ECOSOC resolution.
> > The CSTD Chair entrusted you with the mission of implementing the
> > request made to her. In light of that and the above information we
> > urge you to retract the decision of 7 December, and to establish an
> > appropriately constituted Working Group consistent with the WSIS
> > formulation ensuring “the full and active participation of
> > governments, the private sector and civil society from both
> developing
> > and developed countries, involving relevant intergovernmental and
> > international organizations and forums”.
> >
> > ------------------
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> > governance at lists.cpsr.org
> > To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> > governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> >
> > For all list information and functions, see:
> > http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> >
> > Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20101209/b7bd4dc0/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list