[governance] enhanced consultations - further inputs

[McTim]

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:43 AM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> A new communication from UN DESA asked for inputs to also specifically focus
> on the following two questions.
>
> What international public policy issues pertaining to the Internet are not
> being adequately addressed by current mechanisms?
> What specific processes should be pursued to enhance international
> cooperation in these areas?
>
> IT for Change made an additional input addressing these questions, which is
> enclosed.

I find it highly ironic that your organisation wants both FOE as
indicated in an earlier mail by Guru AND and a new, powerful, dynamic
GIC which would (IMHO) stop folk like wikileaks.

I submit that you can't have both.

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t