[governance] Net neutrality on mobiles

[Jeanette Hofmann]

On 10.08.2010 14:52, Desiree Miloshevic wrote:
>
> On 10 Aug 2010, at 14:19, Jeanette Hofmann wrote:
>
>>> All of it misses the point that the telcos have never really been NN
>>> practitioners, it's just not part of who they are.
>>>
>>> My question is "why now?" What does Google have to gain at this point
>>> by saying " under this proposal we would not now apply most of the
>>> wireline principles to wireless, except for the transparency
>>> requirement". Is this the best they could get?
>>
>> Perhaps Google expects the pro-neutrality camp to fall apart and other
>> content providers negotiating deals with carriers as well? Perhaps
>> Google-Verizon is just the first deal that goes public.
>>
>
> Perhaps also an offer Google could not refuse?

You mean, in terms of McTim's question, this _is_ the best deal they 
could get?

jeanette
>
> Desiree
> --
>
>> jeanette
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t