[governance] Net neutrality on mobiles

[McTim]

All,

Here is the "deal", a proposed policy framework.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/35599242/Verizon-Google-Legislative-Framework-Proposal

It may be the same as the link Ian sent, but connectivity is dodgy this morning.

Lots of negative reaction on huffpost (a site I can reach albeit slowly):

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/adam-green/breaking-google-goes-evil_b_676021.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/josh-silver/google-verizon-deal-the-e_b_671617.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/craig-aaron/google-verizon-pact-it-ge_b_676194.html

All of it misses the point that the telcos have never really been NN
practitioners, it's just not part of who they are.

My question is "why now?" What does Google have to gain at this point
by saying " under this proposal we would not now apply most of the
wireline principles to wireless, except for the transparency
requirement".   Is this the best they could get?

@Tracy, any country can offer regulations that says "a bit is a bit is
a bit, thou shall not treat them differently".  However, since most
regulators are cozy with the telcos who have never treated bits
equally, this is unlikely to happen.  Maybe in Scandinavia tho, one
never knows!

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t