[governance] Internet Access 2G

[Jean-Louis FULLSACK]

Sorry for missing attached document


Hello Ginger and the list 


Attached to this mail you'll find an interesting information about the new US vision and legislation on Internet Access. A track for an "Internet Access 2G"  standard ? ...

Best regards

Jean-Louis Fullsack
CSDPTT France 



> Message du 21/04/10 21:21
> De : "Ginger Paque" 
> A : "'governance at lists.cpsr.org'" 
> Copie à : 
> Objet : Re: [governance] OC meetings in Geneva May 10 and 11 IGC statement?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> My reference to the Geneva OC is for the Open Consultation planning meetings for the IGF (Internet Governance Forum) 2010 in Vilnius. From the IGF website:
> 
> The Preparatory Process The next meeting will be held as a planning meeting open to all interested stakeholders and will take place on 10-11 May 2010. Meeting schedule: 10-13 and 15-18 hours.
> Registration will be opened shortly. 
> 
> The planning meeting will be followed by a MAG meeting on 12 May 2010.
> 
> From: http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/
> 
> Best, Ginger
> 
> On 4/21/2010 2:13 PM, Eric Dierker wrote: Ginger,
 
Please link us up to what you are talking about and the "request" "invitation" for such a statement. 
> 
> --- On Wed, 4/21/10, Ginger Paque wrote:
> 

> From: Ginger Paque 
> Subject: [governance] OC meetings in Geneva May 10 and 11 IGC statement?
> To: "'governance at lists.cpsr.org'" 
> Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 2:38 PM
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I expect to be at the Geneva OC meetings May 10th and 11th, to act as onsite remote moderator (to present any substantive remote comments or questions), and to represent the IGC.
> 
> While discussions have moved forward on workshop proposals, I have not seen any concrete suggestions for an IGC statement. Are there points the IGC membership would like to make? Are there affiliated (IRP, Gender, etc.) groups who are making statements that the IGC should support? Supporting actions of our members is one function that we have not exercised fully imho. However to do so, we need someone from the group to ask for IGC support, and to have consensus from the list.
> 
> As coordinators, Jeremy and I cannot take action for the IGC unless we know what the members want done/said, so that we represent the members of the IGC. 
> 
> Please let us know what you would like the IGC to 'do' at the upcoming OC.
> 
> Thanks! Regards, Ginger
> 

> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

>
> [ message-footer.txt (0.4 Ko) ]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100423/b383140f/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: IG_Secret treaty will impose draconian US Internet.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 17099 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100423/b383140f/attachment.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t