[governance] OC meetings in Geneva May 10 and 11 IGC statement?

[shaila mistry]

Hi Ginger 
Can you send us information on remote participation.
regards
 Shaila 

 
Life is too short ....challenge the rules
Forgive quickly ... love truly ...and tenderly
Laugh constantly.....and never stop dreaming! 
 

From: Ginger Paque <gpaque at gmail.com>

To: "governance at lists.cpsr.org" <governance at lists.cpsr.org>
Sent: Wed, April 21, 2010 12:21:09 PM
Subject: Re: [governance] OC meetings in Geneva May 10 and 11 IGC statement?

Hi,

My reference to the Geneva OC is for the Open Consultation planning
meetings for the IGF (Internet Governance Forum) 2010 in Vilnius. From
the IGF website:

The Preparatory Process The next meeting will be held as a planning meeting open to all
interested stakeholders and will take place on 10-11 May 2010. Meeting schedule: 10-13 and 15-18 hours.
Registration will be opened shortly. 

The planning meeting will be followed by a MAG meeting on 12
May 2010.

From: http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/

Best, Ginger

On 4/21/2010 2:13 PM, Eric Dierker wrote: 
Ginger,
> 
>Please link us up to what you are talking about and the
>"request" "invitation" for such a statement. 
>
>>--- On Wed, 4/21/10, Ginger Paque <gpaque at gmail.com> >wrote:
>
>
>>>>From: Ginger Paque <gpaque at gmail.com>
>>>>Subject: [governance] OC meetings in Geneva May 10 and 11 IGC statement?
>>>>To: "'governance at lists.cpsr.org'" <governance at lists.cpsr.org>
>>>>Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 2:38 PM
>>
>>
>>Hi everyone,
>>
>>>>I expect to be at the Geneva OC meetings May 10th and 11th, to act as
>>onsite remote moderator (to present any substantive remote comments or
>>questions), and to represent the IGC.
>>
>>>>While discussions have moved forward on workshop proposals, I have not
>>seen any concrete suggestions for an IGC statement. Are there points
>>the IGC membership would like to make? Are there affiliated (IRP,
>>Gender, etc.) groups who are making statements that the IGC should
>>support? Supporting actions of our members is one function that we have
>>not exercised fully imho. However to do so, we need someone from the
>>group to ask for IGC support, and to have consensus from the list.
>>
>>>>As coordinators, Jeremy and I cannot take action for the IGC unless we
>>know what the members want done/said, so that we represent the members
>>of the IGC. 
>>
>>>>Please let us know what you would like the IGC to 'do' at the upcoming
>>OC.
>>
>>>>Thanks! Regards, Ginger
>>
>>>>-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>>
>>____________________________________________________________
>>>>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
>>>>To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>>>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>>>>For all list information and functions, see:
>>>>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>>>>Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100421/5cd7fc33/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t