[governance] OC meetings in Geneva May 10 and 11 IGC statement?

[Parminder]

Ginger

BTW, the MAG meeting on the 12th will consider/ assess MAG's own role in 
the IGF's process. A statement for that can perhaps be attempted. parminder

Ginger Paque wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My reference to the Geneva OC is for the Open Consultation planning 
> meetings for the IGF (Internet Governance Forum) 2010 in Vilnius. From 
> the IGF website:
>
> *The Preparatory Process* The next meeting will be held as a planning 
> meeting open to all interested stakeholders and will take place on 
> *10-11 May 2010*. Meeting schedule: 10-13 and 15-18 hours.
> Registration will be opened shortly.
>
> The planning meeting will be followed by a MAG meeting on *12 May 2010*.
>
> From: http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/
>
> Best, Ginger
>
> On 4/21/2010 2:13 PM, Eric Dierker wrote:
>> Ginger,
>>  
>> Please link us up to what you are talking about and the "request" 
>> "invitation" for such a statement.
>>
>> --- On *Wed, 4/21/10, Ginger Paque /<gpaque at gmail.com>/* wrote:
>>
>>
>>     From: Ginger Paque <gpaque at gmail.com>
>>     Subject: [governance] OC meetings in Geneva May 10 and 11 IGC
>>     statement?
>>     To: "'governance at lists.cpsr.org'" <governance at lists.cpsr.org>
>>     Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 2:38 PM
>>
>>     Hi everyone,
>>
>>     I expect to be at the Geneva OC meetings May 10th and 11th, to
>>     act as onsite remote moderator (to present any substantive remote
>>     comments or questions), and to represent the IGC.
>>
>>     While discussions have moved forward on workshop proposals, I
>>     have not seen any concrete suggestions for an IGC statement. Are
>>     there points the IGC membership would like to make? Are there
>>     affiliated (IRP, Gender, etc.) groups who are making statements
>>     that the IGC should support? Supporting actions of our members is
>>     one function that we have not exercised fully imho. However to do
>>     so, we need someone from the group to ask for IGC support, and to
>>     have consensus from the list.
>>
>>     As coordinators, Jeremy and I cannot take action for the IGC
>>     unless we know what the members want done/said, so that we
>>     represent the members of the IGC.
>>
>>     Please let us know what you would like the IGC to 'do' at the
>>     upcoming OC.
>>
>>     Thanks! Regards, Ginger
>>
>>     -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>>     ____________________________________________________________
>>     You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>          governance at lists.cpsr.org
>>     <http://us.mc807.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance@lists.cpsr.org>
>>     To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>          governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>     <http://us.mc807.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org>
>>
>>     For all list information and functions, see:
>>          http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>>     Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100422/14ceeaa0/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t