[governance] Results of charter amendment vote

[Avri Doria]

On 27 Sep 2009, at 14:05, Danny Younger wrote:

> to extend the vote in order to obtain the particular outcome that  
> they themselves preferred.

there is no way they could have done this.

Extending the vote could not make more people vote.
it also did not make more people vote in favor of the amendments.
your consequent does not (can not) follow for you antecedents.

if anyone had chosen to not vote during the original period, they  
could have continued choosing not to vote.
an if anyone felt forced to vote, in some way, but having the vote  
extended, they still could have voted against to amendment.

there is no logical way to assume anything from these circumstances.

btw, threatening to appeal seems a bit well, threatening.
either appeal or don't, but why threaten?

a.




____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance