[governance] Extension of Charter Amendment Vote

[Rui Correia]

Eric

You are nauseatingly tiring!

Do you have inside information that the extension will favour the amendment?
How so? Why can it not favour the rejection of the amendment? There are lots
of passive members on the list that the "No" block (if there is such a
thing) could mobilise to reject the amendment.

There are bigger problems then extension of the polling period. So, instead
of making it your life's ambition to reply to as many posts as possible to
break down the cohesion of the list by disseminating your paralysing venom,
please try and focus.

It is tiring posters like yourself that are bringing down the list as people
avoid posting not to attract and have to deal with the diatribes by the
likes of you and others of your coterie.

Enough said, and of course you have your right of reply, but I will withhold
mine to reply to you.

Regards,

Rui



2009/9/16 Eric Dierker <cogitoergosum at sbcglobal.net>

> This is fallacious. It favors the charter amendment without question. No
> votes no Charter amendment.  There has been no indication of the
> problems/reasons you give.  The problems and reasons you give were and are
> totally foreseeable in this age, yet they have not ocurred.
>
> Did Avri and Derrick put their "consultations" in writing?  Did they give
> general information or did they apply it to this case?  Were these all done
> in private?  Have the votes been in anyway tallied yet? Has their been a
> private petitioner asking in private to extend?
>
> Ginger, I would hope the world is watching.  I would hope we have an
> "impact" here.  It is important to many people these things be done giving
> the utmost respect to decorum and openness and transparency.  Our example
> can have a good or bad impact.
>
> --- On *Wed, 9/16/09, Ginger Paque <gpaque at gmail.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Ginger Paque <gpaque at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [governance] Extension of Charter Amendment Vote
> To: "Eric Dierker" <cogitoergosum at sbcglobal.net>
> Cc: governance at lists.cpsr.org
> Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 1:48 PM
>
>
> Dear Eric and all,
>
> To ensure that this is proper election protocol, Ian and I consulted with
> Derrick Cogburn (votiing) and Avri (charter rules) who have assured us that
> in an email ballot, given problems of delivery, timing and technical
> problems, scheduling and time zones, this is perfectly appropriate in this
> case. It does not favor one side or the other, but gives all voters
> increased opportunity to participate at their convenience.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Eric Dierker wrote:
>
>   This is bad protocal.  Extending a vote so that you get a referendum of
> sorts is a tampering with the vote. If the amendment fails then it fails. It
> is not proper to change the rules in mid process..  Could you please site
> the authority for extending the or a vote.
>
> --- On *Wed, 9/16/09, Ginger Paque <gpaque at gmail.com><http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=gpaque@gmail.com>
> * wrote:
>
>
> From: Ginger Paque <gpaque at gmail.com><http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=gpaque@gmail.com>
> Subject: [governance] Extension of Charter Amendment Vote
> To: "'governance at lists.cpsr.org'"<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=%27governance@lists.cpsr.org%27>
> <governance at lists.cpsr.org><http://us.mc839..mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance@lists.cpsr.org>
> Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 8:38 AM
>
> In order for a Charter amendment vote to be valid, we need almost every
> single voting member to exercise their right to vote. That means if you are
> not ill or without an Internet connection, we need you to vote. If you have
> not voted, please do so NOW. A charter amendment is designed to be a serious
> task. This requires the input of all members.
>
> To facilitate your vote, we have now extended the voting process for
> another 10 days. Please vote now so that you do not forget!
>
> Best,
> Ginger
>
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance@lists.cpsr.org>
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org<http://us.mc839.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=governance-unsubscribe@lists.cpsr.org>
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance<http://lists.cpsr..org/lists/info/governance>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>


-- 
________________________________________________


Rui Correia
Advocacy, Human Rights, Media and Language Consultant
2 Cutten St
Horison
Roodepoort-Johannesburg,
South Africa
Tel/ Fax (+27-11) 766-4336
Mobile (+27) (0) 84-498-6838
_______________
áâãçéêíóôõúç
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20090916/66fb8e54/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance