[governance] Call for consensus - Statement by IGC supporting

[Fouad Bajwa]

Hi Lisa,

I fully support the statement.

I would also like to emphasize that as long as the IGF Secretariat
does not actively involve the Human Rights Council like it involves
UNESCO, ITU, UNCTAD, UNDP etc, the Internet Rights statements will
remain vague, if we even have .01% of participation and support from
the Human Rights Council, consider the issue of Internet Rights
entering main theme setting and discussion in a much shorter
anticipated time period.

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Lisa Horner<lisa at global-partners.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
>
> We’re now past the deadline for comments, so I’ve pasted a final version
> below for the consensus call.  Please could you send a message to the list
> to say if you support the statement or not.  I’ll now hand over to Ginger
> and Ian to finalise and coordinate it getting read out at the IGF planning
> meeting.  I’ll also get in touch with the DCs.
>
>
>
> Shaila – this version includes your edits, apart from in the final para as I
> think Parminder’s comments made sense.  Hope that’s acceptable to you.
>
>
>
> Thanks everyone for your inputs.  I think it’s a strong statement now.
>
>
>
> All the best,
>
> Lisa
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> FINAL STATEMENT (V6) – for consensus call
>
>
> The Caucus [and undersigned DCs] repeat their request that the programme for
> IGF-4 in Egypt gives greater priority to human rights.  The WSIS Declaration
> and Tunis Agenda strongly reaffirmed the centrality of human rights in the
> information society. Despite this, human rights and associated principles
> have received too little attention at the IGF so
> far. This is problematic because :
>
> *    Fundamental human rights such as the rights to freedom of expression,
> privacy, civic participation, education and development are strongly
> threatened by the actions and restrictive policies of a growing number of
> actors vis a vis the internet, including state and private actors at both
> national as well as global levels.
>
> *    The internet presents new opportunities for upholding and advancing
> human rights, for example through enhancing access to knowledge and common
> resources. It is vital that we build on and enhance these opportunities.
> Ignoring these avenues to uphold human rights implies a serious opportunity
> cost for the well being of peoples, globally.
>
> *    International human rights, as contained in the Universal Declaration
> of Human Rights and confirmed by the core human rights treaties and other
> universal human rights instruments, are legally binding.  The growing role
> of information and communication technologies has not changed the legal
> obligation of states that have ratified these instruments to respect,
> protect and implement the human rights of their citizens.
>
> *    The human rights framework is an internationally agreed set of
> standards that has practical as well as ethical value.  It balances
> different rights against each other to preserve individual and public
> interest.  In addition to its legally binding implications, human rights are
> therefore a useful tool for addressing internet governance issues, such as
> how to deal with security concerns on the internet in compliance with the
> rights to freedom of expression and privacy.  Besides stating the
> obligations of states and governments, the human rights framework also
> allows us to derive the rights and responsibilities of other stakeholders.
>
> The Internet Governance Caucus [and undersigned DCs] call for the human
> rights dimension of all internet governance issues to be included in the
> planning and implementation of all future IGF sessions, so that human rights
> are given the attention they deserve as cross-cutting issues.  This should
> include explicit consideration of how global, regional and national policies
> affect human rights, and the development of positive policy principles to
> build an open and accessible internet for all.  The Caucus [and undersigned
> DCs] would like to offer assistance to the organisers of the main plenary
> sessions to do this, and would like to support all stakeholders through
> providing access to relevant guidelines and experts. We see this upcoming
> IGF in Egypt and future IGFs as renewed opportunity to make Rights and
> Principles a core theme.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>



-- 
Regards.
--------------------------
Fouad Bajwa
@skBajwa
Answering all your technology questions
http://www.askbajwa.com
http://twitter.com/fouadbajwa
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATVDW1tDZzA
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance