[governance] Review Panels

[jfcallo at isocperu.org]

Distinguished members of this list:
I write from Lima, Peru, we are interested in participating in ICANN,  
contribute from our experience, how do to connect with ICANN?, Send an  
e-mail for 10 days and no one responds.
Thanks
Jose F. Callo Romero
     Secretario
     ISOC Peru


Quoting Danny Younger <dannyyounger at yahoo.com>:

> Bertrand,
>  
> There is more to this equation than diversity, balance, and   
> representativeness; these review panels will require individuals   
> with extensive knowledge regarding the particulars of the areas   
> under review (which is why independent experts are cited as part of   
> the necessary review team mix).
>
> The teams will include:
>  
> the Chair of the GAC
> the CEO of ICANN
> representatives of the Root Server System Advisory Committee
> representatives of the Security and Stability Advisory Committee
> representatives of the At-Large Advisory Committee
> representatives of the Generic Names Supporting Organization
> representatives of the Address Supporting Organization
> representatives of the Country Code Names Supporting Organization
> independent experts (likely drawn from either the Technical Liason   
> Group, the IETF, the IAB, or from the pool of volunteer community   
> members)
>  
> and in the accountability/transparency review team, these members   
> will be joined by the Assistant Secretary for Communications and   
> Information of the DOC,
>  
> The current arrangement calls for the composition of the review  
> team to be agreed jointly by the Chair of the GAC (in consultation  
> with GAC members) and the CEO of ICANN.
>  
> Like all comparable ICANN processes, there will likely be a call for  
> volunteers (similar to the recent call for NSCG placeholder  
> councilors).  The ICANN Board will then privately settle upon  
> whomever best promotes the ICANN interest (likely those that have  
> never been critics) and will then advance those names to the Chair  
> of the GAC.
>  
> I fully expect these reviews to be as much of a whitewash as all  
> earlier ICANN self-review efforts.  Perhaps you will recall the  
> earlier commissioned review of transparency and accountability  
> provided in the One World Trust report -- we were told that ICANN is  
> a model of transparency with robust accountability mechanisms... and  
> yet we all know the reality.
>  
> Don't waste your energy on this project.  The deck will be stacked  
> from day one.
>  
> best regards,
> Danny Younger
>  
>
> --- On Thu, 10/15/09, Bertrand de La Chapelle   
> <bdelachapelle at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle at gmail.com>
> Subject: [governance] Review Panels
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org, "Anriette Esterhuysen" <anriette at apc.org>
> Date: Thursday, October 15, 2009, 4:33 AM
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> Could this list also address Anriette's concrete second question ?   
> What do you think the review process should be ? Fundamentally, the   
> community is facing a now recurring problem (cf. WGIG, MAG,...) :   
> how to compose a multi-stakeholder group for a given task, so that   
> it is sufficiently diverse, balanced and representative of the   
> variety of viewpoints ?
>
> In addition, what do you tink the timing is ?
>
> Best
>
> Bertrand
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Anriette Esterhuysen   
> <anriette at apc.org> wrote:
>
> snip
>
> Second question is about the submissions on the review panels. What is
> the process likely to be?
>
> Anriette
>
>
>
>
> --
> ____________________
> Bertrand de La Chapelle
> Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for  
> the Information Society
> Ministère des Affaires Etrangères et Européennes/ French Ministry of  
> Foreign and European Affairs
> Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32
>
> "Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de  
> Saint Exupéry
> ("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>
>
>



____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance