[governance] Avri: 'Work Group Guidlines' summary

[Yehuda Katz]

Avri,

I'm trying to sort-out the Jurisdictional Boundaries's here, as they are bring
created for Work Groups.

Please summarize the intentions of the 'Work Group Guidelines'.
Ref.: Operating Model Guidebook (Links Below)

What is the purposeful outcome of having such Work Group Guidelines.

Is it;

1: A process of Applying (an application form) too Icann for WG status. (thus
becoming an Icann governable appendage, of Icann)?

2a: Is the WG independent of Icann, with an Affirmation of Commitments (AoC) of
the WG to Icann?
or
2b: Is the WG independent of Icann, with an Affirmation of Commitments (AoC)
from Icann to the WG?

3: Lets say that the CPSR.Org applies for WG Status and is accepted, In what
manner is the WG's Work-Product
subject to Icann's acceptance & rejection?

-
Ref. Links: Operating Model Guidebook - Updated 26 November.doc
https://st.icann.org/icann-ppsc/index.cgi?working_group_team

PDF:
https://st.icann.org/data/workspaces/icann-ppsc/attachments/working_group_team:20091126101248-0-5062/original/Operating%20Model%20Guidebook%20-%20Updated%2026%20November.pdf

DOC:
https://st.icann.org/data/workspaces/icann-ppsc/attachments/working_group_team:20091126101257-0-5832/original/Operating%20Model%20Guidebook%20-%20Updated%2026%20November.doc

---
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance