[governance] Future of IGF

[Qusai AlShatti]

Dear All:
The ITU statement said that ITU secretariat will submit a
recommendation to member states to support the continuation (or
extension) of the IGF. I recall that what was mentioned in the ITU
intervention.

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org> wrote:
> Now that 4th IGF is over, we are entering into the consultation phase for the
> future of IGF, right. I happened to meet with some Chinese government
> officials here at Cairo airport lounge and asked them about their position
> about the continuation of IGF.  As some of you may noticed, the statement
> they made at the stock-taking pleanry was not clear.
>
> They said China does not support the IGF to continue, and the translation
> of the statement was not clear that time. So they have submitted their
> written statement later.
>
> ITU did suppor the continuation, but China pointed out that that is the
> secretariat position, there has been no official resolution by the member
> states of ITU.
>
> Oh well... another round of negotiation!
>
> izumi
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance