[governance] Re: [A2k] Live Coverage of the Bilski Supreme Court Hearing?

Jeffrey A. Williams jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Fri Nov 6 16:40:14 EST 2009


Manon and all,

  Indeed this is a very interesting case that I and many
INEGroup members have been following closely.  Our position
in this case has already been expressed frequently.  We
oppose business plans as patentable.

-----Original Message-----
>From: Manon Ress <manon.ress at keionline.org>
>Sent: Nov 6, 2009 2:24 PM
>To: a2k discuss list <a2k at lists.essential.org>
>Subject: [A2k] Live Coverage of the Bilski Supreme Court Hearing?
>
>I am not sure how this is possible but ...
>Manon
>
>The Practising Law Institute's Patent Center Will Provide Live
>Coverage of the Bilski Supreme Court Hearing
>
>Posted on: Friday, 6 November 2009, 11:00 CST
>
>Legal education organization will live blog court proceedings for
>landmark intellectual property decision on November 9
>
>WASHINGTON, Nov. 6 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- On Monday, November 9,
>2009, in Washington, D.C., the United States Supreme Court will hear
>oral arguments in the much anticipated Bilski case, which could well
>decide whether business methods and software remain patentable in the
>United States.
>
>The Practising Law Institute (PLI), the nation's largest producer of
>continuing legal education, will be present at this hearing, providing
>continuous updates throughout the day via its Patent Practice Center
>blog, an increasingly recognized forum for patent news and opinion
>
>On October 30, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the
>Federal Circuit issued its much anticipated decision in In re Bilski,
>which presented the central question of whether a purely mental
>process is patentable subject matter. The Federal Circuit addressed
>the issue so broadly that it ultimately affected the patent-
>eligibility of numerous software-related inventions. Many had been
>expecting a far-reaching decision that dealt a blow to "pure" business
>method patents, but few expected just how far-reaching the decision
>would be, or that it would call into question thousands of software
>patents granted over the last ten to fifteen years.
>
>http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/1782068/the_practising_law_institutes_patent_center_will_provide_live_coverage/index.html?source=r_technology
>
>
>***************************************************************************
>Manon Ress
>manon.ress at keionline.org
>Knowledge Ecology International
>1621 Connecticut Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20009 USA
>Tel.:  +1.202.332.2670, Fax: +1.202.332.2673
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>A2k mailing list
>A2k at lists.essential.org
>http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/a2k

Regards,

Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 294k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Phone: 214-244-4827
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list