[governance] Summary of IGP comments on the NTIA ICANN proceeding

[McTim]

On 6/8/09, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels at uwimona.edu.jm> wrote:
> I have been following the submissions and I would argue that purely on the
> stats, it appears the comments are decidedly in favour of continuance of JPA
> or instantiation of some form of USG oversight, no?

temporarily, I think is the flava.

>
> As it happens, the African Union is for continuance.

I don't think they have taken a position.  The paper called "Africa is
Not Ready Yet"
is by an AU staffer, but is not an official position.  Is that what
you are referring to?

 So are Verizon,
> VeriSign and some organization called the Coalition for Online Trademark
> Protection along with assorted others.  Vint Cerf and ISOC are for
> concluding JPA.

As am I.

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance