[governance] JPA - final draft for comments

Ian Peter ian.peter at ianpeter.com
Thu Jun 4 04:35:08 EDT 2009


Mc Tim has made clear he doesnt support this particular paragraphs inclusion
- many others have supported it however. Does anyone else object to this
particular paragraph or have suggested wording changes?


Ian


On 4/06/09 7:46 AM, "McTim" <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 6/3/09, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:
>> 
>>  One additional add on to my last message - the following text -
>> 
>> 
>>  Irrespective of when the JPA actually ends however, the IGC believes that it
>>  should be replaced by a new global, multistakeholder accountability
>>  framework, the development of which should commence in early 2010 (I would
>>  prefer : "as soon as possible"), in an open, transparent and inclusive
>>  process."
>> 
> 
> that's a deal-breaker for me, sorry. the rest is fine tho.
> 
> 


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list