[governance] JPA - final draft for comments
Ian Peter
ian.peter at ianpeter.com
Thu Jun 4 04:35:08 EDT 2009
Mc Tim has made clear he doesnt support this particular paragraphs inclusion
- many others have supported it however. Does anyone else object to this
particular paragraph or have suggested wording changes?
Ian
On 4/06/09 7:46 AM, "McTim" <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/3/09, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:
>>
>> One additional add on to my last message - the following text -
>>
>>
>> Irrespective of when the JPA actually ends however, the IGC believes that it
>> should be replaced by a new global, multistakeholder accountability
>> framework, the development of which should commence in early 2010 (I would
>> prefer : "as soon as possible"), in an open, transparent and inclusive
>> process."
>>
>
> that's a deal-breaker for me, sorry. the rest is fine tho.
>
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list