[governance] JPA - final draft for comments

[Milton L Mueller]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeanette Hofmann [mailto:jeanette at wzb.eu] 

> The fact that the US industry has other reasons to opt for an 
> extension also won't change my mind.
 
It should. 

Both of you can't get what you want from JPA extensions. 

The idea that the JPA should be retained until no stakeholder has any complaint about ICANN is unrealistic. Realize what kind of a game is being played here. Some of us are dissatisfied with ICANN's accountability and institutional structure; those are legitimate concerns. Others are just unhappy with policy outcomes. The JPA puts them both in the same pot and mixes them up so that they are indistinguishable. You will never get out of that game as long as ICANN is reviewed by the US and makes decisions that are controversial. 




____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance