[governance] JPA - final draft for comments

[Jeanette Hofmann]

Sorry but I disagree. While I recognized that the IANA contract provides 
another leverage that could be used to get some form of external 
accountability framework established, I don't see why this implies that 
one should the JPA expire just like that. I firmly believe that external 
accountability is necessary for ICANN, and I havn't changed my mind on 
that. The fact that the US industry has other reasons to opt for an 
extension also won't change my mind.

jeanette

Milton L Mueller wrote:
> This is an illogical position. No meaningful changes can take place
> before the JPA ends (in three months!). If you want the US not to let
> go before meaningful accountability mechanisms are in place, then
> talk about the IANA contract. That focuses people's minds.
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: Jeanette Hofmann
>> [mailto:jeanette at wzb.eu]
>> 
>> The point is not whether or not JPA provides accountability. The
>> point is to replace the JPA by something that promises to provide 
>> accountability - and, AFAIAC, to get this something in place before
>> the JPA ends.
>> 
> ____________________________________________________________ You
> received this message as a subscriber on the list: 
> governance at lists.cpsr.org To be removed from the list, send any
> message to: governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see: 
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance