[governance] Consensus and IGC in the IGF process

[Parminder]

Yes.

Ginger Paque wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Many people have worked very hard on the IGC response to the IGF 
> questionnaire. Some of you have followed silently, some did not have 
> time to follow. However, if you are receiving this email, you should 
> be considering sending your opinion to the Call for Consensus.
>
> The Internet Governance Caucus, should be using its voice, and 
> offering the input that the IGF Secretariat is requesting. This voice 
> does not consist of 20-25 people who actively worked on the 
> questionnaire; it is the whole caucus. Think of this as the "open 
> working group". However, the Call for Consensus is directed to the 
> whole IGC.
>
> Please take the time to review the final statement, and respond to the 
> Call for Consensus. The Call for Consensus is open for the rest of the 
> day (July 17th GMT). Thanks!
>
> Best,
> Ginger
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20090718/f2cdc77a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance