[governance] IGF Review Question 6 start

Sivasubramanian Muthusamy isolatedn at gmail.com
Wed Jul 8 12:59:50 EDT 2009


Hello Ginger,

Great idea. Splitting the task into points to be attended to by various
participants. Makes it easy. Would work.


Sivasubramanian Muthusamy


On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Ginger Paque <gpaque at gmail.com> wrote:

> Vanda, could you please draft a final text to add to the response to
> Question 6, stating your point?
>
>
> Vanda Scartezini wrote:
>
>> Dear all As I had the opportunity to state in public forums, my proposal
>> is to define
>> (where there is not) and enhance (where already exist as in Latin America)
>> regional forums, given them the IGF name and support, in order to get
>> specific issues of regional interest raised and with several suggestion,
>> have more chance to see those issues implemented by local governments/
>> communities.
>>  I believe IGF has achieved one huge goal which is put over the table the
>> importance of internet for all stakeholders, but  it needs to help the
>> implementation of several suggestion raised during these years, and since
>> implementation occurs at local level is more than relevant to encourage
>> IGF
>> regional meetings with the signature and the strength of the IGF
>> Best to all, Vanda Scartezini
>> POLO Consultores Associados
>> &  IT Trend
>> Alameda Santos 1470 cjs 1407/8
>> 01418-903 Sao Paulo,SP.
>> Fone + 55 11 3266.6253
>> Mob + 5511 8181.1464
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ginger Paque [mailto:gpaque at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 08,
>> 2009 11:43 AM
>> To: Jeanette Hofmann; William Drake; 'governance at lists.cpsr.org'; 'Ginger
>> Paque'
>> Subject: [governance] IGF Review Question 6 start
>>
>> Working on Jeanette and Bill's suggestions, and noting that we can submit
>> answers to some questions without necessarily including all of them, I ask
>> that anyone who is interested open a thread and start discussion on that
>> question.
>>
>> "6. If the continuation of the Forum is recommended, what improvements
>> would you suggest in terms of its working methods, functioning and
>> processes?"
>>
>> Since the value and effectiveness of the IGF are obvious, with
>> near-unanimous response that it should continue, we believe that the review
>>  should focus on addressing the issue of more inclusive participation.
>> More importantly, the energy not needed in a review of the current process
>> could be spent in the search for ways to foster more active inclusion of
>> rarely heard and developing country voices through, but not limited to,
>> remote participation.
>>
>> And here we include for example, Indigenous peoples worldwide, people with
>> disabilities, rural people and particularly those who are the poorest of the
>> poor and often landless or migrants, those concerned with promoting peer to
>> peer and open access governance structures built on an electronic platform,
>> those looking to alternative modes of Internet governance as ways of
>> responding to specific localized opportunities and limitations, and those
>> working as practitioners and activists in implementing the Internet as a
>> primary resource in support of broad based economic and social development.
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>    governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>    governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>    http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20090708/31ba5274/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance


More information about the Governance mailing list