[governance] IGF consultations - extending IGF's mandate

[Parminder]

Roland Perry wrote:
> In message <49717897.4060801 at itforchange.net>, at 11:50:07 on Sat, 17 
> Jan 2009, Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> writes
>> Now, it is not entirely clear if 'IGF participants' are only those 
>> who gather for the annual IGF, or the open consultations also in some 
>> form comprises of IGF participants.
>
> Plus there are many who contribute to the process (either the main IGF 
> or the consultations) without ever attending a physical meeting. Isn't 
> that what we should be encouraging, anyway?

Ronald

The above was not about what we should promote under the notion of 'IGF 
participants'. It is an attempt to build an understanding of what those 
in charge of driving the process of consultations over the issue of 
extending the mandate of the IGF are likely to consider as 'IGF 
participants',  in fulfillment of the relevant requirement laid by the 
World Summit on the Information Society documents. Parminder

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance