AW: [governance] Cities and Internet Governance

[Dirk Krischenowski | dotBERLIN]

Dear Roland,

as you may have seen, the cityTLDs already filed their application for a
City TLD Constituency at
http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/newco-process-en.htm

It is expected that the .company TLDs will found a similar constituency,
also the cultural TLDs and may be also some other sub-groups which do not
think they fit into the gTLD Registry Constituency.

Best Regards,

Dirk


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Roland Perry [mailto:roland at internetpolicyagency.com] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Februar 2009 22:54
An: governance at lists.cpsr.org
Betreff: Re: [governance] Cities and Internet Governance

In message 
<75822E125BCB994F8446858C4B19F0D71496197B at SUEX07-MBX-04.ad.syr.edu>, at 
13:17:59 on Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> writes
>This is the third or fourth time I have heard that assertion made, but 
>no one that makes it has ever bothered to define and propose (in 
>writing) a structure that gives you lots of constituencies and 6 
>Council seats without doing it the way we propose.

As a new entrant to this debate, it seems to me that the obvious 
solution is one new constituency for "registries in waiting".
-- 
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance