AW: [governance] Cities and Internet Governance

Dirk Krischenowski | dotBERLIN krischenowski at dotberlin.de
Tue Feb 24 01:45:02 EST 2009 

Izumi,

I do understand your concerns but I don't agree on them. The second Draft
Applicant Guidebook clearly states that every (!)TLD application will be
reviewed by a Geographic Names Panel (GNP), so in my view it is nearly
impossible to smuggle any geo name through the process. I also think the GNP
will use Google to find out if the names applied for is identical to city,
county or other geo name of importance. And there is additionally an
objection process which allows third parties to file an objection or inform
ICANNs "Independent Objector" that something is wrong with the name applied
for. ... and finally do not have any doubt that people from the Japanese or
global Internet community will have a look on all TLD applications.

In any (!) case of a geo name the respective goverments / authorities need
to have at least no objections.

Even in the case the very popular German Pop Band Tokyo Hotel would like to
acquire .tokyo and the .tokyo Initiative does not apply in the same round,
there is not way around to get a geo name quick and easy!

I hope my perspective gave you confidence that a geo name accidentally slips
through the system.

By the way, if you need some information how we in Berlin manage to set-up
the .berlin name space, we would appreciate to share our knowledge with you.
A couple of cities already invited us to consult them a bit.

Best regards,

Dirk (.berlin)


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: izumiaizu at gmail.com [mailto:izumiaizu at gmail.com] Im Auftrag von Izumi
AIZU
Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Februar 2009 05:20
An: governance at lists.cpsr.org
Betreff: Re: [governance] Cities and Internet Governance

Yes, Geographic name TLDs are making some concern to the cities and other
local governments (prefectures, villages etc) in Japan, and our government,
MIC, started a "study group" with some of these city gov officials as
participants, with ccTLD and other Internet related folks and pundits
under the info-com council, a sort of regulatory committee.

"What if someone outside Japan applied for dot Kyoto, or any other
potentially valuable name as gTLD?" "How should we react?"
How can we monitor all of these? Do we need to organize some
sort of "monitoring" under the central gov function, or shall we do it
with private-sector led activities? Is it really a bad thing? Or does
it promote our tourism and export?

I agree, it is opening up a new venue for the "Internet governance".

izumi

2009/2/23 Thomas Lowenhaupt <toml at communisphere.com>:
> With the ICANN having deemed cities eligible to develop TLDs, and with
> cities such as Barcelona, Berlin, New York, and Paris lining up for TLDs,
> it’s time to consider the place and impact city-TLDs will have on Internet
> governance.
>
>
>
> My presumption in presenting the following scenario is that cities will
> choose to put their TLDs to use for their long term development: to
benefit
> city organization and governance, communities, neighborhoods, small
> businesses, residents, and their global “findability,” all toward the
> creation of economically viable and livable cities; and not merely treat
> their TLDs as monetization opportunities. Further, that cities will see
> their TLDs as community / civic resources, as vital as air, water, roads,
> and education systems are to their future. And we see the formation of
> conservator or trustee systems to assure their wise management.
>
>
>
> That said, let me review our experience developing a governance structure
> for the .nyc TLD, albeit a work in progress, and then project where cities
> might fit within the broader governance of the Net.
>
>
>
> Creating a governance structure for a city TLD is new territory and we’re
> still fashioning structures to facilitate the TLD’s efficacy. Since
creating
> Connecting.nyc Inc. as a not-for-profit in 2006 we’ve seen governance as
the
> critical factor in determining the TLD’s success: important both to the
> inclusion of a diversity of viewpoints in planning and directing the TLD’s
> operation, and to receiving the approval and cooperation of the city of
New
> York whose support we deem essential.
>
>
>
> To date we’ve recruited a great core for our board of
directors, established
> a Resident Advisory Network, and are in discussions with city officials
> about adding several ex-officio seats. To gain a feel for the city's
> concerns about the TLD’s governance, read the transcript
>
(http://www.openplans.org/projects/campaign-for.nyc/council-hearing-transcri
pt)
> of our October 17 hearing before the City Council, in particular our
> discussion with Council Member DeBlasio about his desire to place a “short
> leash” on our operation.
>
>
>
> On our governance page
> (http://www.openplans.org/projects/campaign-for.nyc/board-of-directors) we
> discuss our intention to create space on our board of directors for public
> participation, with our Resident Advisory Network a first step in that
> direction. It’s a different structure than the ICANN’s current stakeholder
> model, destined to be local and more hands on.
>
>
>
> With city TLD governance structures of this sort in place, we see
city-TLDs,
> each with a governance model reflective of the city it serves, providing a
> mechanism for broader public participation within ICANN’s structure. It’s
my
> expectation that, with their growing share of the world’s population, now
> 50% heading toward 70% in 2030, the Internet’s future governance form will
> reflect the participation of city-TLDs. And as we create participatory and
> effective governance structures for city-TLDs, they will garner standing
for
> a significant role in the Net’s governance.
>
>
>
> Where are we today? In June 2008 the developers of the Barcelona, Berlin,
> New York, and Paris TLDs met in Paris to discuss cooperation between
> city-TLDs and participation in Internet governance processes. Last week a
> coalition of cities presented ICANN with a Notice of Intent to create a
> constituency within the GNSO. This is an appropriate first step, and
within
> this newly developing sphere one begins to see an emergence of an engaged
> user community that will strongly influence governance of the Internet.
>
>
>
> There’s lots more work to be done here, and we would appreciate
and benefit
> from the thoughts of those on this list.
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>



-- 
                        >> Izumi Aizu <<

          Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo

           Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita,
                                  Japan
                                 * * * * *
           << Writing the Future of the History >>
                                www.anr.org
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

More information about the Governance mailing list