[governance] CONSENSUS CALL - IGF ROLE

Jeanette Hofmann jeanette at wzb.eu
Tue Feb 17 07:17:52 EST 2009


Hi, I support both statements.
jeanette

Carlos Afonso wrote:
> Yes to this one as well.
> 
> --c.a.
> 
> Ian Peter wrote:
>> We also need to get a consensus on the following statement which, depending
>> on the flow of the consultations, may be delivered with or separately to the
>> statement on the IGF review.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Please indicate YES or NO in response. If responding no and can articulate
>> why, we may be able to accommodate suggestions even at this late stage.
>>
>>  
>>
>> STATEMENT
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>> The Internet Governance Caucus is of the view that the IGF should continue
>> beyond its first mandated period of five years.
>>
>>  
>>
>> There are two clear, and relatively distinct, mandates of the IGF -  first,
>> regarding public policy functions, as a forum for multistakeholder policy
>> dialogue, and second, regarding capacity building. Both aspects of the IGF's
>> role need to be strengthened.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Especially, one role (for instance, capacity building) should not be
>> promoted to the exclusion of the other (policy related role). If the IGF is
>> assessed not to be sufficiently contributing to its one or the other
>> principal roles, adequate measures should be considered to improve its
>> effectivenesses vis-a-vis that role. 
>>
>>  
>>
>> It is important that IGF remains open to addressing all issues that are in
>> the IG space, no matter how controversial. Very likely, the more
>> controversial an issue, the more appropriate it may be to bring it to the
>> IGF where inputs from a diverse range of stakeholders can be sought.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Deliberations at the IGF can be used as inputs for global Internet policy
>> making, which will help make policy-making processes more participative and
>> democratic.
>>
>>  
>>
>> We congratulate the IGF secretariat on doing exemplary work in the last few
>> years, However for this success to be built on, the IGF should be assured
>> stable and sufficient public funding to be able to carry its functions
>> effectively, and impartially in global public interest. To this end we
>> believe it is important that no other UN organization gets involved in the
>> IGF's management.
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>> Ian Peter
>>
>> PO Box 429
>>
>> Bangalow NSW 2479
>>
>> Australia
>>
>> Tel (+614) 1966 7772 or (+612) 6687 0773
>>
>> www.ianpeter.com
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>>
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list