[governance] IGF Workshop reports

[Roland Perry]

In message <p06240804c76258a1d3d2@[221.115.9.46]>, at 22:47:14 on Thu, 
31 Dec 2009, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> writes

>There's a section in each workshop proposal "The Workshop is proposed 
>on behalf of"  and it's the organizations listed there that are 
>responsible for the report.

That's exactly what I was suggesting (see below).

>They should know who they are as the organized and held a workshop in 
>Sharm.

Up to a point. Sometimes even joint proposers were no-shows in Sharm (or 
had played no part in the planning other than tentatively agreeing to be 
a speaker). But at least this narrows the field considerably.

>>Maybe one way out is to differentiate between Joint Proposers, and 
>>"Co-organisers to be approached" (to use the language of the website).
>>
>>Roland.
-- 
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance