[governance] AW: [tt-group] FW: GAID

Mon Dec 28 04:20:05 EST 2009

>From the point of heterogeneity of the the Asiuan Continent, I should like to suggest one representative each from the following: China - 1; India- 1; 3 other representatives from the rest of the region.

Prof. Keshava Nireshwalia,M.Sc.,M.Ed.,D.F.P.Tech.,M.I.S.T.E.,
Consultant, Trainer & Auditor ISO 9001,17025,14000,18000, 22000,etc.
Reliance Advisor No.20095240;  Tel: 91-821-2342612; Mob: 094818 14418.
Visiting Professor, JSS University, Mysore; 
Life Member, MCC & Industries/APFS/AMI/NSI/AFST(I)/ISTD,etc.

--- On Mon, 12/28/09, Jean-Louis FULLSACK <jlfullsack at orange.fr> wrote:

From: Jean-Louis FULLSACK <jlfullsack at orange.fr>
Subject: RE: [governance] AW: [tt-group] FW: GAID
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org, "Vanda UOL" <vanda at uol.com.br>, "'"Kleinwächter  Wolfgang"'" <wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de>, "'Tim Unwin'" <tim.unwin at rhul.ac.uk>, "'George Sadowsky'" <george.sadowsky at attglobal.net>, "'Michael Gurstein'" <gurstein at gmail.com>, tt-group at vancouvercommunity.net
Date: Monday, December 28, 2009, 2:30 PM

Just a gag : why not consider the "G12" proposed by Mrs Reding in May ?

You don't rermember that ? Here it is summarized :

Create a "G12 for in Internet governance" which should be convened three times a year 
Composition :
The president of ICANN
2 represntatives of Europe
2 represntatives of Africa
2 representatives of North America
2 representatives of South America
3 representatives of Asia and Pacific region
This "G12" should debat on general orientations for the Internet and should -when necessary (sic)- formulate recommendations agreed on by the majority of its members to the attention of ICANN. 
End of the proposal.

Isn't it a marvelous team ? Mrs Reding was unfortunately replaced as the ICT-IS Commissioner in Barroso 2 Commission. What a pity ! Will her successor, Mrs Kroes, be as prolofic for such folkloric suggestions ? 
BTW : Multistaholderism is likely to be ignored by the EC ...

Best
Jean-Louis Fullsack

> Message du 27/12/09 14:48
> De : "Vanda UOL" 
> A : governance at lists.cpsr.org, "'"Kleinwächter, Wolfgang"'" , "'Tim Unwin'" , "'George Sadowsky'" , "'Michael Gurstein'" , tt-group at vancouvercommunity.net
> Copie à : 
> Objet : RE: [governance] AW: [tt-group] FW: GAID
> 
>             Hi Wolfgang,   Hope too much snow haven't compromise your Christmas time! Around here very hot! And no real results from Denmark meeting!    I do believe we need to work to "multistakeholderised" the WISIS forum. For me this is high priority!. Mag could take a lead to organize this, I agree.  2010 we might have an appropriate "half time" document to mark the effort already done and the goals to achieve till 2015.  Great 2010 for all of you!   Best       Vanda Scartezini  Polo Consultores Associados  Alameda Santos 1470 #1407  Tel - +55.11.3266.6253  Mob- +55.11.8181.1464  vanda at uol.com.br        -----Original Message-----
>  From: "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" [mailto:wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de] 
>  Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 7:54 AM
>  To: Tim Unwin; George Sadowsky; Michael Gurstein; tt-group at vancouvercommunity.net
>  Cc: governance at lists.cpsr.org
>  Subject: [governance] AW: [tt-group] FW: GAID     Dear list     one opportunity to have a more strategic brainstorming around a reasonable Follow up of GAID could be the IGF consultations in February in Geneva. I propose to have on Wednesday, February, 10, 2010, over lunch (1315 - 1500) a meeting of people present in Geneva. We had a similar meeting last year (in the ITU Montbrillant Building) where we identified an "identity crisis of GAID" with no consequences after the meeting. The meeting was chaired by Bill and Sarbulan was online from NY.      Any proposal?        BTW I could imagine to move the "WSIS Forum", which is emerging from the annual meetings of the Actions Lines, into something which could absorb previous UNICTTF/GAID activities. My impression is that so far the "WSIS Forum" is mainly in the hand of the ITU and other IGOs, having the lead position in the Action Lines. The WSIS Forum could be further "multistakeholderised" and the
 responsibility to organoze the meeting - convened by the UN/ITU/UNESCO/FAO/ILO - could go to a MAG like group. Do not forget that 2010 makrs half way towards 2015m the dateline for the Geneva and Tunis Commitments.     Wolfgang       ____________________________________________________________  You received this message as a subscriber on the list:       governance at lists.cpsr.org  To be removed from the list, send any message to:       governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org     For all list information and functions, see:       http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance    
>
> [ message-footer.txt (0.3 Ko) ]
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20091228/0388395b/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1592 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20091228/0388395b/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance