[governance] Statement by IGC supporting rights and principles

Jeffrey A. Williams jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Thu Aug 27 15:38:04 EDT 2009


Katitza and all,

  Yes I've read much of what Bruce has to say.  He is essentially correct
as well here.  None the less such forms of Censorship are fundementally
wrong and wrong headed.  

-----Original Message-----
>From: katitza at datos-personales.org
>Sent: Aug 23, 2009 6:38 PM
>To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
>Subject: Re: [governance] Statement by IGC supporting rights and principles
>
>Holas!
>
>I like how Bruce Schneier frame this discussion on Internet Censorship.
>China's actions as well as those similar actions held by Democratic
>governments around the world. The full article is here.
>
> See http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0908.html
>
>Here I highlight a few paragraphs:
>
>"China is the world's most successful Internet censor. While the Great
>Firewall of China isn't perfect, it effectively limits information flowing
>in and out of the country. But now the Chinese government is taking things
>one step further."
>(...)
>"Green Dam has many uses. It can police a list of forbidden Web sites. It
>can monitor a user's reading habits. It can even enlist the computer in
>some massive botnet attack, as part of a hypothetical future cyberwar."
>(...)
>China's actions may be extreme, but they're not unique. Democratic
>governments around the world -- Sweden, Canada and the United Kingdom, for
>example -- are rushing to pass laws giving their police new powers of
>Internet surveillance, in many cases requiring communications system
>providers to redesign products and services they sell.
>(...)
>Many are passing data retention laws, forcing companies to keep
>information on their customers. Just recently, the German government
>proposed giving itself the power to censor the Internet.
>(...)
>"The United States is no exception. The 1994 CALEA law required phone
>companies to facilitate FBI eavesdropping, and since 2001, the NSA has
>built substantial eavesdropping systems in the United States. The
>government has repeatedly proposed Internet data retention laws, allowing
>surveillance into past activities as well as present."
>(...)
>
>"Surveillance infrastructure can be exported, which also aids
>totalitarianism around the world. Western companies like Siemens, Nokia,
>and Secure Computing built Iran's surveillance infrastructure. U.S.
>companies helped build China's electronic police state. Twitter's
>anonymity saved the lives of Iranian dissidents -- anonymity that many
>governments want to eliminate.
>
>Every year brings more Internet censorship and control -- not just in
>countries like China and Iran, but in the United States, the United
>Kingdom, Canada and other free countries."
>
>The full article is here
>http://www.schneier.com/crypto-gram-0908.html
>
>
>> I agree with you both, Ginger and Katitza!
>> I've been collaborating -and still do :)- with the Freedom on the Net
>> Project at Freedom House, and this is my persective, too. Freedom of
>> expression and privacy all togheter.
>> Regards,
>> Roxana
>>
>>
>>
>> 2009/8/23 <katitza at datos-personales.org>
>>
>>> I agree, Ginger. We should remember that some stakeholders would prefer
>>> to
>>> highlight only freedom of expression and dismiss privacy. We should
>>> always
>>> add privacy in this kind of discussion, including the tensions between
>>> privacy and freedom of expression that many international human rights
>>> groups has work on it.
>>>
>>> I do not think that this discussion is too late!
>>>
>>> Katitza
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
>>> > <html>
>>> > <head>
>>> > </head>
>>> > <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
>>> > <font face="Arial">This article from "New Scientist" gives a good
>>> > overview of the importance of the Internet for Communication, and the
>>> > need to keep it as a "free space". While we may disagree on any
>>> > specific topic, I think we all agree on the general idea that freedom
>>> > of expression and communication must be protected. Internet Governance
>>> > is an important tool for that protection, as it can strategize across
>>> > borders. It reminds me that I think that the the IGC should take a
>>> > strong stance on the issue of Internet rights. There will be Open
>>> > Consultations for the IGF in Geneva in September. I think we should
>>> > have a short, concise statement of support for rights and principles
>>> to
>>> > be emphasized in the agenda at Sharm El Sheikh. It is probably too
>>> late
>>> > to make any significant changes to the agenda, but I think it is
>>> > important to keep our point in the discussion, even if it is just in
>>> > laying the groundwork for next year.<br>
>>> > <br>
>>> > Any thoughts, suggestions, comments? Can someone propose a working
>>> > draft?<br>
>>> > <br>
>>> > Best, Ginger<br>
>>> > <br>
>>> > <br>
>>> > <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
>>> > href="
>>> http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20327224.100-worldwide-battle-rages-for-control-of-the-internet.html?full=true&print=true
>>> ">
>>> http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20327224.100-worldwide-battle-rages-for-control-of-the-internet.html?full=true&print=true
>>> </a><br>
>>> > <br>
>>> > </font>
>>> > <p class="infuse">WHEN thousands of protestors took to the streets in
>>> > Iran following this year's disputed presidential election, Twitter
>>> > messages sent by activists let the world know about the brutal
>>> policing
>>> > that followed. A few months earlier, campaigners in Moldova used
>>> > Facebook to organise protests against the country's communist
>>> > government, and elsewhere too the internet is playing an increasing
>>> > role in political dissent.</p>
>>> > <p class="infuse">**Now
>>> > governments are trying to regain control. By reinforcing their efforts
>>> > to monitor activity online, they hope to deprive dissenters of
>>> > information and the ability to communicate.**</p>
>>> > <br>
>>> > </body>
>>> > </html>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
>>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>>
>>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>>
>>
>
>
>____________________________________________________________
>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
>To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
>For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Regards,

 

Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 294k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Phone: 214-244-4827

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list