[governance] US Congrerss & JPA

[Daniel Pimienta]

>But I don't see a reason to not continue to state the need to ICANN 
>to become really international.

Was not the creation of IGF during the WSIS process a final (and 
difficult) decision reached to find a
compromise on the pressure on the US from the rest of the world to 
release grasp on ICANN,
on one side, and the reluctance from the US to accept changes, on the 
other one?
Was not IGF supposed to eventually help a decision on that very subject?

I also remember that many thought that this "solution" was just a 
manner to earn time by making
people discuss ... and take no decision.

IGF may have evolve das a structure beyond this initial background 
but, if my memory is correct,
I wonder if IGF should not this time go beyong discussion and try to 
reach a consensus for
a formal and public statement in favor of the internationalization of ICANN.


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance