[governance] Tech giants in human rights deal
Jeffrey A. Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Tue Oct 28 10:32:31 EDT 2008
Sivasubramanian and all,
Personally, I agree with RFS'es point of view and thier rightful
position as so stated accordingly. Further as I also pointed out
globalnetworkinitiative.org web site and seeming operational
practice is inhearantly unsafe, promotes spam, and not secure. As
such, without safty and security, the principals
globalnetworkinitiative.org
rightly in my view, espouse, pale by comparison.
See again:
http://private.dnsstuff.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=globalnetworkinitiative.org&token=1420229d463bb2ee1d1428801f109019
and
http://private.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=globalnetworkinitiative.org&token=140049a94f67babf10e43b8920ce9019
Ergo, RSF made a very wise considered decision for most of the right
and porperly principaled reasons. A hardy "Well Done" is in order,
IMHO. They have wisely decided not to become another fly in the
spiders web, as it were...
Sivasubramanian Muthusamy wrote:
> Hello Meryem Marzouki,
>
> Global Network Initiative appears to be an interesting initiative from
> the Corporate Sector which is traditionally perceived not to be in
> tune with Civil Society's concerns.
>
> Reporters Sans Frontieres haven't become a part of this initiative due
> to these concerns as published in the page
> http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=29117
>
> 1 - Local law remains the reference even if it violates
> international human rights standards. Thus, participating companies
> will comply with repressive regimes who have at their disposal an
> arsenal of legal provisions aimed at silencing dissidents.
>
> [-] 2 - The extent to which companies are expected to challenge
> governments' requests remains unclear. Requests in writing are sought
> but not mandatory.
>
> [-] 3 - Companies could still enter into business relationships
> (joint ventures, mergers) with local partners that do not follow the
> principles, then bypass the restrictions imposed by the principles and
> blame the local entity (such as Alibaba for Yahoo!) in case of
> violations of freedom of expression or collaboration for the arrest of
> dissidents.
>
> [-] 4 - Disclosure to users and transparency regarding the type of
> personal information retained by ITC companies' remains
> unsatisfactory.. Users have no assurances that companies will try to
> minimize data collection, nor do they know how long this data will be
> saved.
>
> [-] 5 - The assessors' independence and impartiality as well as the
> extent to which companies' will provide them with the necessary
> information to monitor developments remains uncertain.
> These are valid points. But better raised as a participant of this
> initiative rather than as an outsider. RSF could begin by
> appreciating this initiative from the unexpected quarters and then go
> on to further strengthen the initiative by drawing attention to the
> concerns as listed above.
>
> I feel that RSF's concerns would be better addressed if it
> participates.
>
> Sivasubramanian Muthusamy
> ISOC India Chennai.
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Meryem
> Marzouki <marzouki at ras.eu..org> wrote:
>
> See also more information on Global Network initiative at:
> http://www.globalnetworkinitiative.org, and dissenting voice
> from RSF (explaining why they haven't signed the deal) at:
> http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=29117
>
> Meryem Marzouki
>
> --
> Meryem Marzouki - http://www.iris.sgdg.org
> IRIS - Imaginons un réseau Internet solidaire
> 40 rue de la Justice - 75020 Paris
> Tel. +33(0)144749239
>
>
> Le 29 oct. 08 à 05:35, kwasi boakye-akyeampong a écrit :
>
>
> My apologies for cross posting.
>
> Kwasi
>
> Tech giants in human rights deal
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7696356.stm
>
> By Maggie Shiels
> Technology reporter, BBC News, Silicon Valley
>
>
> Google was accused of censoring 2% of search
> results in China
> Microsoft, Google and Yahoo have signed a global
> code of conduct promising to offer better
> protection for online free speech and against
> official intrusion.
>
> The Global Network Initiative follows criticism
> that companies were assisting governments in
> countries like China to censor the Internet.
> The guidelines seek to limit what data should be
> shared with authorities, in cases where free
> speech is an issue.
> "This is an important first step," said Mike
> Posner of Human Rights First.
> He told the BBC "What this is is a recognition by
> all these tech companies, the human rights groups
> and social investors that there has to be a
> collective response to this growing problem.
> "Companies need to step up to the plate and be
> more aggressive in challenging unwarranted
> government interference," he said.
> The initiative states that privacy is "a human
> right and guarantor of human dignity," and the
> agreement commits the companies to try to resist
> overly broad demands for restrictions on freedom
> of speech and the privacy of users.
> They will also assess the human rights climate in
> a country before concluding business deals and
> make sure their employees and partners follow
> suit.
> "These principles are not going to be a silver
> bullet, but the most important point for me is to
> provide transparency," said Danny O'Brien of the
> Electronic Frontier Foundation.
> "We have joined this initiative because we know
> that a wide range of groups working together can
> achieve much more than the company acting alone,"
> said Andrew McLaughlin, Google's director of
> global public policy.
> 'Valuable roadmap'
> The impetus for such an agreement follows years of
> criticism that a number of businesses, including
> Google, Yahoo and Microsoft have complicity built
> what has been dubbed the "Great Firewall of
> China".
>
> Skype say they are abiding by Chinese laws over
> internet use
> Google has been accused of complying with Chinese
> government demands to filter internet searches to
> eliminate query results regarding topics such as
> democracy or Tiananmen Square.
> Microsoft has come under attack for blocking the
> blog of a prominent Chinese Media researcher who
> posted articles critical of a management purge at
> the Beijing News Daily.
> Canadian researchers uncovered that a Skype joint
> venture in China monitored users' communications.
> And a Chinese reporter Shi Tao was jailed for 10
> years after Yahoo China provided his personal
> information to the Chinese government.
> Today Yahoo co-founder and CEO Jerry Yang welcomed
> the new code of conduct.
> "These principles provide a valuable roadmap for
> companies like Yahoo operating in markets where
> freedom of expression and privacy are unfairly
> restricted.
>
> Shi Tao's jailing sparked a controversy of Yahoo
> business practices in China
> "Yahoo was founded on the belief that promoting
> access to information can enrich people's lives
> and the principles we unveiled today reflect our
> determination that our actions match our values
> around the world," said Mr Yang.
> While China has been painted as the worst abuser,
> Colin Maclay of the Berkman Centre for Internet
> and Society at Harvard University said there are
> other countries and governments all over the world
> at fault.
> "The number of states actively seeking to censor
> online content and access personal information is
> growing.
> "And the means employed - technical, social,
> legal, political - are increasingly sophisticated,
> often placing internet and telecommunications
> companies in difficult positions."
> 'Business case'
> The Global Network Initiative was drawn up by the
> internet companies along with human rights groups,
> academics and investors.
> Adam Kanzer who is the managing director and
> general counsel at Domini Social Investments said
> as well as being the right thing to do, it also
> makes good business sense.
> He told BBC News "When you see the industry being
> caught up in the tactics of various regimes around
> the world, the business case is very clear.
> Freedom of expression and privacy is core to their
> business.
> "They depend on a wide open, freely accessible and
> secure internet. That's what they are about. If
> people don't trust the internet and believe they
> are secure, then that is counterproductive to
> their business."
>
> The plan has yet to receive the support of
> internet companies in China
> The effort is already being seen by some as not
> going far enough.
> "After two years of effort, they have ended up
> with so little," said Morton Sklar executive
> director for the World Organisation for Human
> Rights USA.
> "It is very little more than a broad statement of
> support for a general principle without any
> concrete backup mechanism to ensure that the
> guidelines will be followed."
> Mr Posner of Human Rights First disputes that and
> said this agreement has not been set up as a
> "gotcha system" but as a way "to work with
> companies to get them to improve what they are
> doing, credit them when they do it and call them
> out if they fail."
> While it is hoped many more companies will sign
> up, two European telecommunications firms, France
> Telecom and Vodafone, are already said to be
> considering adding their names.
>
>
>
> .
> ..............................................................................................................................
>
> "If I am not for myself, who will be for me? If I
> am not for others, what am I? And if not now,
> when?" - Rabbi Hillel
> .....................
> ..........................................................................................................
>
>
>
> _
> __________________________________________________________
>
> You received this message as a subscriber on the
> list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
>
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/sivasubramanianmuthusamy
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
My Phone: 214-244-4827
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list