[governance] Better network architecture supported by the CS

[JFC Morfin]

At 19:36 20/11/2008, Yehuda Katz wrote:
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Jefsey,
>Through the years you have suggested the: Semantic Web, Linguistic 
>Web, Semantic Processing, ... etc.,

I do not think I ever advocated anything about the Web application 
per se. W3C is not my territory.

I am interested in the Multilingual and Semantic Internet, the 
Intersem. (the internet of thoughts). Also in what to add to the 
Legacy architecture to support the Semantic stratta. i.e. the 
metacoms over the Internet datacoms over the ITU telecoms. This is 
what I name the "Internet Plus", from the architecture possibilities 
I observe as today possible.

If everyting we try to do (IPv6, IDNS, routing, security, spam, etc.) 
does not really makes it, it is probaby because we do not have much 
to change in the technology itself (at least for now), but probably a 
lot to change in the way we think (of) it.

>What is your current opinion in regards to a "Semantic Web" with "a better
>network architecture" as the Internet/Icann/Iana... moves closer toward IDN
>top-level domain names ?

The current work by Google (Unicode, IETF, ICANN) concerns 
"internationalization", i.e. the support of languages through ASCII 
International English and Google OS. This has quite nothing to do 
with "multilingualization", i.e. the support of each language/script 
as English/ASCII is today supported plus multilinguistic support of 
the diversity by itself.

This is where we agreed with Vint to split/coopete between their IDNA 
and an @large ML-DNS (Multi-many lateralities - DNS).

>Ref:
>http://idn.icann.org/#The_example.test_names

Crap. It cannot work. This has been documented by IAB, 
IETF/WG-IDNABIS tries to correct some of the flaws. The architectural 
approach is not end to end, so this necessarily conflicts in some places.

>Could you explain, How a "better network architecture supported by the CS"
>would be? (What would that be ?)

I am overloaded at the time being with setting up how to work on 
this.  Please give me another week. I try to have something in place 
before the load of the IGF period. The target is that all this can be 
listed, explored, discussed, documented, tested asap. For example, 
how do you want to support the Virtual Root we have today and deploy 
IPv6 without IDv6.

We falled in a misgovernance trap making us believe that "Civil 
Society" was about "Civil Rights" only and not before about Civil 
Defense and mutual care.

jfc


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance