[governance] Nomcom and conflict of interest

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Ian Peter [26/05/08 19:23 +1000]:
>If you acknowledge the reality of a fourth stakeholder in IGF, you can
>understand why some civil society members may not want part of its limited
>number of seats going to representatives of another group. So in fact this
>whole debate really reflects whether a fourth stakeholder group exists or
>does not exist - not some conspiracy to deny basic human rights on the
>grounds of employment as has been characterized.

Ian, I agree with what you say but the corollary is that there would be no
rhyme or reason for technical community people to caucus here.

And as I said, there are shared synergies to the two so that it is
pointless for one set to effectively alienate and exclude the other.
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance