[governance] RE: IPv[4,6, 4/6] was IGF delhi format

[Parminder]

Sorry, wrong posting.

Don't know how this went out. (I was trying to look for izumi's old emails
to get his id to check something with him on the nomcom process)

Parminder 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Parminder [mailto:parminder at itforchange.net] 
> Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 11:41 AM
> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; 'Izumi AIZU'
> Subject: RE: [governance] RE: IPv[4,6, 4/6] was IGF delhi format
> 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: izumiaizu at gmail.com [mailto:izumiaizu at gmail.com] On Behalf Of 
> > Izumi AIZU
> > Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 6:32 AM
> > To: Suresh Ramasubramanian
> > Cc: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Parminder; Stephane Bortzmeyer
> > Subject: Re: [governance] RE: IPv[4,6, 4/6] was IGF delhi format
> > 
> > Though I agree mostly with what you wrote below per se, same thing 
> > should apply to those technical people - if they like to be 
> involved 
> > with social policy and governance issues, they need to know some 
> > basics of policy process and especially here, civil society values 
> > etc. I hope these are always reciprocal or "equal" each other.
> > 
> > AND, I hope one side will provide basics to the other, not 
> expecting 
> > others to study as an "obligation". Though I don't like to put too 
> > much division between the "two" as a dichotomy, and like to 
> see them 
> > come together to make things more productive
> > 
> > izumi
> > 
> > 2008/3/1, Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh at hserus.net>:
> > > Izumi AIZU [01/03/08 09:16 +0900]:
> > >
> > > >who are very much the users of the Internet. It is often
> > presented as
> > > >if
> > >  >the people like me who does not have good knowledge are
> > "inferior" 
> > > to those  >knowledgeables, but I don't agree with that model.
> > >
> > >
> > > It is not a question of inferiority. But if people claim to be 
> > > stakeholders  and step forward to take an active stake in
> > something,
> > > it is really  essential that they have at least a basic 
> (or rather 
> > > more than basic)  technical awareness.
> > >
> > >  Let's put it this way. If you were to become a VP in Ford
> > or Toyota,
> > > yes,  you could be a good business person and be hired for
> > that. But
> > > if you  actually knew the auto industry, and knew what your 
> > > engineering and  manufacturing people were telling you, 
> that'd be a 
> > > definite asset to you in  your role.
> > >
> > >  Once such a guide is set up, a few regular places that civ
> > soc meets
> > > at can  be reached out to (by isoc, diplo or other groups
> > that offer
> > > to take this  developed course and move it forward)
> > >
> > >
> > >         suresh
> > >
> > >
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> > To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> >      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> > 
> > For all list information and functions, see:
> >      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> > 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> 


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance