[governance] IGC nominees for MAG

[Milton L Mueller]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeanette Hofmann [mailto:jeanette at wzb.eu] 
> > Two responses: first, the current MAG has been in place for 2, 
> > 3 years and there has been no rotation. A 1/3 rotation every year
> > therefore would imply that all of them could be rotated. 
> 
> This may be your point of view, and that of Vittorio and a 
> few others. From what I remember, the caucus never discussed this 
> interpretation of the rotation rule, and I don't think there would 
> be consensus on this.

I think I clarified this in an earlier message. You are interpreting my
point to mean that I think ALL MAG members must be rotated now, as a
matter of application of the 1/3 rule. That is not my position. My
position is that the IGC has the duty and the right to put on its new
list only those people who it wants added to MAG. That may include no
existing members, all existing members or somewhere in between. 

> Yes, that is certainly true but it escapes my understanding why the 
> caucus would even consider a list without any of the current members. 

It should be obvious. A list without any current members would happen
ONLY if a large number of people here were strongly dissatisfied with
the performance of the current MAG representatives. 

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance